Truth May Scare You!! BUT THIS WAR CAN KILL US ALL
Warning Reality Check!! What The Media Isn’t Telling You About Syria!! The real “Rebels” in Syria, the Al Qaeda backed Al Nusra Front. Also about 24 factions of FSA Battalions Merge with Al-Qaeda in Damascus and Aleppo. The last portion of the footage is from May and June 2013, it shows battalions from the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) declaring their unification with Al-Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusra (Nusra Front) in the eastern Damascus suburb of Eastern Ghouta and in Aleppo, both strongholds of the anti government militants.
Truth May Scare You!! US Boots On The Ground Syria 24 FSA Battalions Join Al Qaeda!!
The Syrian War What You’re Not Being Told
The below footage from May and June 2013 shows battalions from the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) declaring their unification with al-Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusra (Nusra Front) in the eastern Damascus suburb of Eastern Ghouta and in Aleppo, both strongholds of the anti-government militants. Although some instances have occurred where clashes between the two groups have taken place, for the most part, the FSA and al-Qaeda unite under the banner of Islamic monotheism.
The White House and the President have obviously not managed to get their story straight with each other on Syria, as aides today ruled out a military strike without Congressional approval, while Obama himself refused to do the same.
White House deputy national security adviser Tony Blinken told reporters on Friday that if Congress rejects President Obama’s request to authorize a military strike against Syria, it is “neither his desire nor his intention” to carry out the attack regardless.
However, at the G20 summit in St. Petersburg, Obama was less clear when asked whether he would take military action without Congressional approval.
“I put this before Congress for a reason,” Obama told reporters. “I believe action is more effective and stronger if we are united. I’m not engaging in parlor games with respect to how Congress responds to their constituents’ concerns.”
Obama added that he would have already taken action without consulting Congress had there been a direct threat to the United States or its allies.
Secretary of State John Kerry has clearly suggested that the President WILL go ahead with military action regardless of the outcome of the Congressional vote, a move that could prompt a constitutional crisis.
The comments come at the same time as reports indicating that the chances of the House approving for military action in Syria are so bad that congressional aides are doubting whether a vote will even take place.
“I just don’t believe that if defeat is certain, the House leadership will want to see a president utterly humiliated on the House floor in a public vote,” one top aide to the Republican leadership told National Review. “The weakness it would demonstrate wouldn’t be good for the country.” the aide said.
The Senate narrowly passed a modified version of Obama’s resolution on Wednesday, and the full Senate is likely to begin voting next Wednesday. Both chambers must approve the measure for it to pass.
Meanwhile Obama has announced that he will make a plea to the American people for military action in a White House address on Tuesday.
The whole city of Damascus is 20 miles wide — We’re supposed to believe the Syrian Leader Assad gassed his biggest city 3.5 miles from his Presidential Palace?
BREAKING NEWS: Despite the fact that the political decision to send warships, apparently, it was decided a long time, we know about it is just now from unofficial sources. Thus, the Chinese military blog that specializes in articles about military equipment the United States, Russia and China, said that several Chinese ships already close to the shores of Syria, citing its sources in the PLA. The authors openly admit that the ships would not be in any way involved in a potential conflict, but only observe the actions of NATO and Russian ships. What kind of ships were sent to the coast of Syria is unknown. Meanwhile, the social network Vkontakte citing a confidential source was reported that a Chinese ship Jinggangshan project was seen when passing the Red Sea toward the Suez Canal. ”2:00 this pepelats back among us in the direction of the Suez Canal.Board number 999. Speed 14 knots, judging therefore has specific instructions to be at some point. We are now in the Red Sea somewhere in the center, “- wrote the author. By tail number is later found out that this is a Chinese amphibious assault ship dock Jinggangshan, which can carry on board a landing craft air cushion or other bulky loads. Recall that, according to several sources in Syria might be Chinese counterparts S-300 systems. Meanwhile, this information officially confirmed no one, and the Chinese amphibious ships were seen in the ports of Syria. Source
GOOSE CREEK, S.C. (CBS Charlotte/AP) — South Carolina U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham says he’s convinced that Syrian President Assad used chemical weapons on his own people.
Graham told reporters in Goose Creek on Tuesday that taking action against Syria in response to the situation is not a question of yes or no, but rather a question of bad or worse choices.
He says if there is no U.S. response, Iran will not believe America’s resolve to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Graham also says those nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists could result in a bomb coming to Charleston Harbor.
He says he’s working to convince South Carolinians weary of war that the situations in Syria and Iran are linked. Graham says Syria could destabilize the entire Middle East.
Secretary of State John Kerry said last week that more than 1,400 people, including hundreds of children, were killed during the Aug. 21 chemical attack carried out by Bashar Assad’s regime.
Anderson Cooper and CNN have been caught staging fake news about Syria to justify military intervention.
Photographer Catches John McCain Playing Poker on iPhone During Important Syria Hearing – Read His Sarcastic Response
SWITZERLAND, Zürich — Unable to conduct their Al Qaeda/Syrian Rebel chemical terror attack on America soil on August 24, 2013, the Obama administration and it’s rabid Zionist puppeteers have once again had to rewrite the Syrian terror narrative. While Obama waits to receive U.S. Congressional approval for his premeditated attack on Syria, it’s quite clear that the administration lacks both international and domestic support for a new war.
Therefore, the real terrorists must somehow radically alter public opinion and the best way to do that is by conducting a major false-flag terror operation. A new terror attack would galvanize support for Obama globally while simultaneously giving him the green light to attack American gun owners at home with unmanned drones. Naturally, this type of aggression by Obama would spark a civil war—exactly what it’s intended to do.
The Nuclear “Minotaur V”
Based on breaking news and events, it appears that there is a real possibility of a major state-sponsored cyber-terror attack targeting the Minotaur V rocket launch and the U.S. power grid. According to NASA, on September 6, 11:27 p.m. (EDT), the Minotaur V rocket will launch from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport Pad 0B at the Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. Minotaur V will allegedly be carrying the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) satellite into orbit. The Minotaur V was derived from the Minotaur IV, itself a derivative of the nuclear LGM-118 Peacekeeper ICBM. Minotaur V’s launch will be the first lunar mission to be launched from Virginia and is anticipated to be visible along much of the eastern seaboard from New York to Virginia. Why this particular rocket is being launched from Virginia as opposed to Florida is highly suspicious, especially considering the launch is scheduled for a Friday night in a calculated move to gain the most “live” viewers. Should the rocket be attacked, it is possible that its explosion could have an EMP-like effect as a burst of electromagnetic nuclear radiation causes a blackout of the U.S. electrical grid over New York City and a majority of the East Coast.
As luck would have it; the eyes of the sporting world will be focused on New York City as it hosts the 2013 U.S. Open until September 9, 2013. Coincidentally, Obama will be in attendance at the G-20 Summit in Saint Petersburg, Russia until at least September 6, 2013, so it would be the perfect opportunity for him to grandstand and act “presidential” in the wake of an unprecedented terror attack. Although numerous cyber-patsies have been primed for such an event, the attack will likely be blamed on Syrian Electronic Army who were conveniently added to the FBI’s wanted list on September 6, 2013. If the Minotaur V rocket launch is suddenly canceled or postponed, it will most likely indicate that the payload had been changed and the terror plot was canceled.
Bent Spear 2013
A Bent Spear refers to incidents involving nuclear weapons, warheads, components or vehicles transporting nuclear material which violate or breach handling or security regulations. For only the second time in history, a “bent spear” was reported on September 3, 2013, when Inforwars/STRATFOR released a propaganda article entitled “Exclusive: High Level Source Confirms Secret US Nuclear Warhead Transfer” which stated that a U.S. nuke was on the loose and was headed to South Carolina. Two days later on September 5, 2013, Infowars/STRATFOR released another report entitled “Sen Graham Warns of Nuke Strike After Missing Warheads Report” in which Lindsay Graham reiterated the fear mongering propaganda report in further collusion between the Obama administration and Alex Jones. In the wake of an EMP-like nuclear blast over the East Coast, it is highly likely that Jones will state that this missing nuke was used in the attack.
Cyber-Terror Drill: “GridEx II”
In apparent preparation for a massive cyber-terror attack targeting the U.S. power grid, on August 16, 2013, a New York Times report entitled “As Worries Over The Power Grid Rise, A Drill Will Simulate A Knockout Blow” was published which stated that “the electric grid, as government and private experts describe it, is the glass jaw of American industry. If an adversary lands a knockout blow, they fear, it could black out vast areas of the continent for weeks; interrupt supplies of water, gasoline, diesel fuel and fresh food; shut down communications; and create disruptions of a scale that was only hinted at by Hurricane Sandy and the attacks of Sept. 11”. According to the report, “…Thousands of utility workers, business executives, National Guard officers, F.B.I. antiterrorism experts and officials from government agencies in the United States, Canada and Mexico are preparing for an emergency drill in November that will simulate physical attacks and cyberattacks that could take down large sections of the power grid. They will practice for a crisis unlike anything the real grid has ever seen, and more than 150 companies and organizations have signed up to participate.”
DHS Warns of Major Cyber-Terror Attack
As is generally par for the false-flag terror course; governmental agency heads tend to foreshadow major terror events in a calculated bid to gain plausible deniability. On August 27, 2013, former U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Chief Janet Napolitano explicitly warned that the DHS must prepare for an inevitable large-scale cyberattack against the United States and that her new successor should move fast to strengthen the nation’s cyber-defenses. At Napolitano’s farewell speech at the National Press Club, she stated: “Our country will, at some point, face a major cyber-event that will have a serious effect on our lives, our economy and the everyday functioning of our society. While we have built systems, protections and a framework to identify attacks and intrusions, share information with the private sector and across government, and develop plans and capabilities to mitigate the damage, more must be done, and quickly”. Recent headlines in respect to cyber-related terror attacks and hackers indicate that cyber-terrorism is blinking red on every level.
Cyber-Terror Attack Headlines:
1. August 22, 2013: Nasdaq: ‘Connectivity Issue’ Led To Three-Hour Shutdown
2. August 23, 2013: Anonymous Trolls FBI, Releases Contact Data For All Fed Employees
3. August 24, 2013: Mysterious Computer Glitch Hits Gitmo 9/11 Tribunal
4. August 27, 2013: Napolitano warns large-scale cyberattack on US is inevitable
5. August 27, 2013: ‘Largest Hack’ In Chinese History Has Beijing Stumped
6. August 27, 2013: Syrian Electronic Army Takes Down New York Times Website And Twitter
7. August 28, 2013: ‘N.Y. Times’ Blames Hackers In Latest Website Crash
8. September 2, 2013: Pro-Syrian Group Hacks U.S. Marines Website
9. September 5, 2013: Romanian Hackers Get Hefty Sentences In New Hampshire
[Does not purport to be a complete list of events or headlines]
Cyberattack Propaganda Report
In blatantly naked programming for an impending cyber-terror attack, on September 6, 2013, a USA Today propaganda report entitled “How Prepared Are You For A Cyberattack?” was published. According to the report, most major U.S. companies have been under siege by hackers over the last 18 months. Only two days after Janet Napolitano’s speech warning of an impending cyberattack, a hacker group called the Syrian Electronic Army hacked the New York Times’ website and their Twitter, for the second time in 2013. The report depicts a grim post-cyberattack world: “Imagine waking up one morning with no power. Cellphones can’t connect, banks are closed, the Internet is down and credit cards don’t work. In localized emergencies, workers from other areas help to restore services quickly. A cyberattack could affect wide regions of the country, overwhelming the available manpower. It could take days, weeks or months for basic services to be fully restored. Not a pretty picture”.
Since June of 2012, numerous propaganda articles have stated that a cyber-terror doomsday is imminent and that when it happens, all hell will break loose in America. Headlines such as “‘End Of The World As We Know It’: Kaspersky Warns Of Cyber-Terror Apocalypse”, “Former FBI Cyber Cop Worries About A Digital 9/11”, “Retiring Rep. Norm Dicks Warns Of ‘Cyber 9/11′”, “Panetta: Cyber Threat Is Pre 9/11 Moment”, “Defense Secretary Warns Of ‘Cyber-Pearl Harbor’”, “Threat Of ‘Spectacular’ Cyberattack Looms” and “U.S. Homeland Chief: Cyber 9/11 Could Happen “Imminently“, all indicate that an unprecedented act of state-sponsored cyber-terror upon the United States is imminent. Exactly how a cyber-Doomsday will manifest itself is unknown, but “Live TV” cyber-terror attack appears to be the working plan at this given time.
A Potential Motive
In the aftermath of a major cyber-attack on the United States emanating from Syria, a plausible motive for the attack must be floated to the public by the media. Coincidentally, on August 29, 2013, a report entitled “Satellites Over Pakistan Guided Bin Laden Raid, Leaked NSA Documents Say” was published which stated that a fleet of NSA satellites collecting electronic intelligence over Pakistan guided the raid by U.S. Navy SEALs that allegedly killed Osama bin Laden. Regardless of the fact that bin Laden was reported killed on December 26, 2001, the NSA satellites purportedly tracked phone and communications among al Qaeda operatives, ultimately linking them to the Abbottabad, Pakistan compound where bin Laden allegedly was hiding. Whether or not the a future Syrian based cyber-attack will be blamed on the Assad regime or the Syrian Rebels is not known, but sympathy for bin Laden could serve as a potential motive in either case.
I. CYBER-ATTACK PATSIES:
In the aftermath of major state-sponsored terror attacks, intelligence agencies such as the CIA and the FBI like to have at least three or four different sets of well-groomed patsies. This allows for flexibility when it comes to arrests, propaganda, and an inevitable response. In respect to cyber-terror, Truther.org has identified at least 4 patsies (e.g., the Syrian Electronic Army, Anonymous, the Unknowns, and China) which could ultimately be blamed in the wake of an attack on a NASA ICBM rocket launch.