Dukuvaha Abdurakhmanov has called on United States Congressmen refuse the imperialist ideas of his greatness.

24.03.2015. speaker Dukuvaha Abdurakhmanov has commented on the resolution of the Congress of the United States, which called on Obama to deliver arms in Ukraine.

United States House of representatives on Monday adopted a resolution, the text of which calls for the United States President Barack Obama to send weapons to Kiev.

For this decision were 348 seats against 48.

“The House urges the President (United States) fully and immediately use the authority given by Congress, and provide Ukraine with defensive weapons systems, to enhance the ability of the people of Ukraine to defend its sovereign territory,” the text of the document.

Chairman of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Dukuvaha Abdurakhmanov has commented on the news and turned to American colleagues.

-Distinguished members of the Congress of the United States of America. Citizens of the United States often hear about the exclusivity of the American Constitution. According to your basic law everyone has the right to freedom of speech. “No political speech may not be prohibited merely because it is in favour of one party rather than another. None of the citizens cannot be denied only because they expressed opinions considered to be false or dangerous, said the Supreme Court of the United States in one of its decisions, while the norms of the Constitution of United States.

In the meantime, your words are at odds with your same actions. For believing in false American freedom of speech hurt Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, and many others.

We cannot please the United States guide takes all the blatant actions aimed at destabilizing the internal situation in a contiguous State with Russia, is pushing NATO to the East. All the actions in Europe and the United States near Russian borders are unacceptable, and such a rapid expansion of the West (NATO expansion) is in fact a manifestation of aggression.

The SOVIET UNION, against which the Alliance was based, and ordered the long live back in August, 1991. So what, then, was the purpose of NATO? And anyway, why is he still there?

In many cases, when the supply of American weapons in the trouble spots of the world did not contribute to the settlement of conflicts, but instead led to rocketing of victims, the illegal spread of weapons among criminal and terrorist groups, to an escalation of the conflict.

Look at the results of a post-Soviet NATO activities:

-millions of civilians have become casualties of war United States and its allies in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, torture and ill-treatment of prisoners have become the norm in Abu Ghraib prison, Camp Nama, Guantanamo, the use of unmanned aircraft to attack targets on the territories of different countries became a regular. Thus, during the period from June 2004 to September 2012, as a result of air strikes by u.s. DRONES in Pakistan were killed from 2562-3325 civilians. This can be attributed to the destabilization of the situation in the United States such as Libya, Syria, Egypt, and the Ukraine, where the Government is formed by the United States Vice President Joe Biden, and working and killing civilians in the Donbass and the troops are led by American instructors.

For those of you who advocate the welfare friendly Ukrainian people, I remind you that in a world of many countries where there is not only democracy, but also the most basic of human living conditions are, for example, most countries in Africa. Why are you not worried about their problems? Why is such a concern for democratic freedoms in neighboring countries with Russia, Georgia and Ukraine?

I often wonder: “what interests pursued by America in Ukraine?”. The representatives of our country defended the country from the Nazis. More than 3.5 million of our soldiers died defending the Ukrainian lands from the Nazi invaders. At the same time, some NATO generals, začastivÅ¡ie today in Kiev, were from countries that were once allied with the army of the Third Reich were fighting with Ukrainian people.

In the USSR was the formation of the Ukrainian State. Together with the Ukrainians on the development of the postwar Federal Republic were Russians, Georgians, Chechens, Armenians and Jews. None of the American dollar has been spent on the restoration and development of Ukraine after the second world war. Moscow and Kiev have built the nation together, the Russian and Ukrainian peoples today are fraternal.

It follows that the United States had no right to advise Russia how to behave with an adjacent friendly people. Delivery of weapons Ukraine would be perceived as a signal to us an appropriate action-we will deliver innovative weapons Mexico to resume debate on the legal status of the annexed territories, where the United States now are the American States of California, New Mexico

http://www.newsweek.com/chechnya-threatens-arm-mexico-if-us-sends-weapons-ukraine-316959

http://parlamentchr.ru/press-centre/news/1924-454-50

==============================