In her statement Wednesday, Ms. Napolitano defended the report, which says rightwing extremism may include groups opposed to abortion and immigration, as merely one among several threat assessments. But she agreed to meet with the head of the American Legion, who had expressed anger over the report, when she returns to Washington next week from a tour of the U.S.-Mexico border.
WATCH THIS VIDEO:
The document on right-wing extremism sent last week by this department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis is one in an ongoing series of assessments to provide situational awareness to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on the phenomenon and trends of violent radicalization in the United States, Ms. Napolitano said in her statement.
I was briefed on the general topic, which is one that struck a nerve as someone personally involved in the Timothy McVeigh prosecution, Ms. Napolitano said.
Ms. Napolitano insisted that the department was not planning on engaging in any form of ideological profiling.
Let me be very clear: We monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States. We don’t have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence, Ms. Napolitano said.
We are on the lookout for criminal and terrorist activity but we do not – nor will we ever – monitor ideology or political beliefs. We take seriously our responsibility to protect the civil rights and liberties of the American people, including subjecting our activities to rigorous oversight from numerous internal and external sources.”
The Times reported Tuesday that the department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) issued April 7 the nine-page document titled Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment. Outcry from veterans groups, Republican lawmakers and conservative activists followed, but the reaction spread Wednesday to Democratic lawmakers and liberal-leaning groups.
In his letter to Ms. Napolitano, Mr. Thompson demanded that Homeland Security officials explain how and why they wrote the report and whether it poses any threat to civil liberties.
As I am certain you agree, freedom of association and freedom of speech are guaranteed to all Americans – whether a person’s beliefs, whatever their political orientation, are extremist or not, Mr. Thompson said.
Mr. Thompson said the report blurred the line, and that he is disappointed and surprised that the department would allow this report to be disseminated to law enforcement officials nationwide.
Homeland Security officials have declined to say who wrote report, except that it was a career official and not a political appointee.
Only three employees are listed in the Federal Yellow Book as working for the I&A office – acting Undersecretary Roger Mackin and two executive assistants.
Mr. Thompson’s letter said, I am particularly struck by the report’s conclusion which states that I&A ˜will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing extremist activity in the United States with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization. He demanded to know what types of activities the Homeland Security Department had planned for the next several months.
Rightwing extremism, the report said in a footnote on Page 2, goes beyond religious and racial hate groups and extends to those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.
It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration, said the report, which also listed gun owners and veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars as potential risks.
The assessment is not the first Homeland Security product to examine threats based on political extremism. In January, the department sent law enforcement officials an assessment of cyberterrorism threats from such left-leaning sources as environmental, animal rights and anarchist groups.
Mike German, policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union and a former FBI agent, said his organization was concerned about law enforcement agencies focus on radicalization, regardless of the specific ideology.
Certainly, the right-wing report is focused far too much on rhetoric and things people say and things people think rather than on criminal activity and the people involved in criminal activity, he said. There is plenty of crime out there for federal, state and local law enforcement to worry about. They don’t need to invent threats that they have no factual basis for supporting
The American Legion on Tuesday said the latest report unfairly stereotypes veterans.
“I am aware of the letter from American Legion National Commander [David K.] Rehbein, and my staff has already contacted him to set up a meeting next week once I return from travel. I will tell him face-to-face that we honor veterans at DHS and employ thousands across the department, up to and including the Deputy Secretary, Ms. Napolitano said.
As the department responsible for protecting the homeland, DHS will continue to work with its state and local partners to prevent and protect against the potential threat to the United States associated with any rise in violent extremist activity, Ms. Napolitano said.
Asked about the report at Wednesday’s White House briefing, press secretary Robert Gibbs said he has not spoken with President Obama specifically about it.
Without getting into the report, I think the president works hard every day to make sure that all Americans are safe and secure, Mr. Gibbs said.
And I would say that, as it relates to some aspect of the report, that the president believes those who serve our country represent the very best of it, Mr. Gibbs said.
House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said Wednesday that the department owes veterans an apology.
To characterize men and women returning home after defending our country as potential terrorists is offensive and unacceptable, he said. Everyone agrees that the department should be focused on protecting America, but using such broad-based generalizations about the American people is simply outrageous.
Rep. Steve Buyer of Indiana, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, called it inconceivable that the Obama administration would categorize veterans as a potential threat.
This kind of mischaracterization can lead to discrimination against veterans in our society, especially in the job market, Mr. Buyer said. Vietnam veterans were subjected to this unfair treatment, and I call upon President Obama and members of Congress to refute any similar stereotyping of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.
Jon Ward contributed to this report.
In June, Infowars.com cited a report by WhoWhatWhy.com revealing that the FBI was aware of an organization, possibly a local police department or private security company, that had plans to assassinate peaceful protesters during the Occupy Movement. The classified document released by the FBI read: An identified [DELETED] as of October planned
On Constitution Day, a reminder that the supreme law of the land requires citizens participation in order to remain strong According to federal law, September 17th is Constitution Day a day that all federally financed educational and governmental institutions must teach about the Constitution. When is the last time We the People read the
Several dozen U.S. Army active duty and reserve troops were told last week that the American Family Association, a well-respected Christian ministry, should be classified as a domestic hate group because the group advocates for traditional family values. The briefing was held at Camp Shelby in Mississippi and listed the AFA alongside domestic hate groups
The footage, recently captured in Spokane Valley, begins with a local resident asking two deputies why police would need vehicles specifically designed for warfare abroad.
I mean, we’ve got a lot of constitutionalists and a lot of people that stockpile weapons, lots of ammunition, one deputy says. They have weapons here locally.
The startling admission not only points to active surveillance of legal gun owners, but of those who support the country’s founding document, further solidifying concerns among law-abiding citizens that police are receiving military equipment and training in order to target conservative Americans.
The deputy’s specific mention of constitutionalists, a broad term covering millions of Americans, as opposed to criminals in general, also indicates a clear training mindset linked to the FBI and Homeland Security, two groups which have absurdly labeled liberty-lovers as terror threats.
Such clear talking points are unsurprising given reports that Spokane County sheriffs have received training from the Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that ludicrously compares mainline conservative Americans to racist hate groups.
Infowars was unable to reach the Spokane County Sheriff’s Office for comment at the time of publishing, but did speak with Spokane Valley Republican Representative Matthew Shea, who was appalled when presented with the footage.
Will law abiding citizens who love the Constitution and Rule of Law be hunted down with MRAPs Shea asked. Constitutionalism is fundamental to being an American. To hate the Constitution and those who support it means you are a traitor to this country.
This is spitting in the face of all those heroes that fought, bled, and died so we might live free. The question should be, why aren’t you a Constitutionalist? Why don’t you believe in the rule of law? Why don’t you believe that the Constitution means what it says?
Incredibly, the Spokane County Sheriff’s Office is not the first to cite patriotic Americans as reasoning for military hardware.
A police sergeant in Morgan County, Indiana admitted just last May that his department had obtained an armored vehicle in part because of returning military veterans, deemed domestic terror threats by Homeland Security in 2009.
In August of 2013, Concord, New Hampshire Police Chief John Duval secretly contacted Homeland Security and demanded an armored vehicle due to the alleged threat posed by peaceful libertarians.
A New York State Counter Terrorism Bulletin leaked to Infowars by concerned police that same year attempted to label anyone concerned with government gun confiscation as far right conspiracy theorists, even as admitted gun confiscation programs are used against law abiding citizens in states such as California.
The MIAC Report, a federal training document famously presented to Missouri police in 2009, went as far as falsely tying supporters of former Presidential Candidate Ron Paul and the Constitution to extremist groups as well.
Despite a massive drop in police officer deaths, gun homicide and violent crime in the last 2o years, government agencies across the board continue to adopt military tactics in order to fight anything that represents traditional America.
Luckily for Americans, peace officers who still respect their oath continue to serve throughout the United States.
UPDATE: The Spokane County Sheriff’s Office has responded on Facebook by falsely claiming that the video is out of context. Despite the deputy clearly pointing to constitutionalists as reason for needing armored military vehicles, the sheriff’s office has chosen to ignore the issue at hand.
Following Obama’s choreographed attack on the Second Amendment earlier this week, the Department of Homeland Security announced it will join the administration, the Justice Department and the FBI in a renewed attack on firearms.
Under the guise of preventing what is largely unpreventable short of disarming the entire country eliminating active shooter situations “ DHS boss Janet Napolitano announced on Wednesday she will work to “identify measures that could be taken to reduce the risk of mass casualty shootings, in other words, disarming law-abiding gun owners.
The Department of Homeland Security is basically an interior ministry ostensibly created in response to the attacks of September 11, 2001. Although its stated goal is to prepare for, prevent, and respond to domestic emergencies, particularly terrorism, it has, since its creation in October of 2001, pursued its real and unstated objective acting as an internal political police force tasked with undermining and attacking enemies of the ruling elite.
DHS: Global Elite’s Secret Political Police
The DHS is not dedicated to preventing future mass casualty shootings, as Napolitano recently stated, but is assigned the critical task of attacking political enemies considered a threat to the globalist status quo. From lurid fictional claims about rightwing extremists to shepherding a national effort to undermine and destroy an idealistic Occupy movement, the DHS has repeatedly demonstrated that it is a political secret police.
The Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment document leaked to the alternative media in 2009 set the stage for demonizing gun owners and Second Amendment advocates in addition to a panoply of other political groups derisively tagged as rightwing extremist by the government.
The Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) also produced a document in 2009 warning about the danger of a purported Modern Militia Movement, including the likes of Ron Paul, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin. MIAC and fusion centers around the country coordinated with the DHS to collect, evaluate, analyze, and disseminate information and intelligence on the supposed threat of libertarians and constitutionalists, including Second Amendment advocates. Between 2004 and 2007, the DHS provided $254 million to fusion centers engaged in surveilling Americans considered a terrorist threat by the government.
Earlier this year, the DHS released a report, “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970 to 2008,” that employed the phrase extreme right-wing, ethno-nationalist/separatist to describe individuals and groups it claims pose a domestic terrorist threat.
Conflating liberty issues with racism is a deliberate attempt to further demonize Americans opposed to the policies of the federal government. Designating opposition as racist is a well-tread path taken by the corporate media and Democrats, particularly since the election of Obama.
According to the latest DHS report, the new terrorists in this country are the Americans who love liberty, hate unconstitutional government edicts and fear the bureaucrats running Washington, D.C., writes Pat Shannan. Second Amendment advocates are at the top of this ˜terrorist list, but a mere pro-life bumper sticker might be enough to make one suspect in the eyes of a dumbed-down cop who forgot his oath.
Pentagon Joins Effort to Target Pro-Second Amendment Movement
More recently, the government enlisted a West Point think tank to produce propaganda detailing the so-called far right and warn about white supremacists teaming up with the anti-federalist movement to attack political enemies, the government and most notably the police.
The West Point report specifically targets the patriot movement and constitutionalists opposed to a federal government controlled by an international financial oligarchy. These violence-prone terrorists, the report states,
espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement. (Emphasis added.)
The last sentence in the above underscores the purpose of the report generated by the United States Military academy demonizing libertarians, constitutionalists, and specifically advocates of the Second Amendment as violent terrorists who pose a direct threat to law enforcement. The effort is designed to radicalize the elite’s front line police and first responders and set them against the far right.
Establishment Media’s Orchestrated Propaganda Campaign
The establishment media’s concerted campaign against the Second Amendment has delivered a relentless barrage of polarizing and divisive propaganda in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre in December.
CBS Chief Washington Correspondent and anchor of Face the Nation, Bob Schieffer, demonstrated the absurd lengths the establishment will go to trash the Constitution and sow fear and dissension of firearm ownership.
Following Obama’s speech earlier this week, Schieffer said dismantling the Second Amendment may present a formidable task, but one less daunting than passing civil rights legislation or defeating Nazi Germany in World War II.
Producing a relentless wave of skewed surveys and op-eds in favor of gun control and gun safety (the latest misleading euphemism) reveals the urgency of the effort to disarm America and render it helpless.
Conclusion: Law-abiding Gun Owners Are the Target, Not al-Qaeda Terrorists
It is now obvious what is going on in the wake of Sandy Hook the establishment is finally pulling out the last remaining stops in its long envisioned disarmament of the American people in accord with its ultimate plan to usher in a one-world government and financial system. A well-armed and educated populace prevents the global elite from realizing this objective.
In order to realize this required disarmament, supporters and defenders of not only the Second Amendment but the Constitution at large must be branded as renegade terrorists who threaten police. The cynical propaganda effort to pose law enforcement against a growing liberty movement is key to the elite’s effort to impose an authoritarian police state on America, a plan that will not be successful if the American people are allowed to possess firearms more potent than 22 caliber bolt-action rifles.
In Case You Missed ¦.Proof That You Are Living A Lie! UPDATES DAILY posted on June 26, 2014 WHO IS ISIS REALLY? PROOF YOU’RE NOT GOING TO BELIEVE June 27, 2014 tatoott1009 OK AMERICA BECOMES NOUTH AMERICA , AND THE WORLD BECOME SLAVES !!!! DON WRIGHT, President | CEO Before taking over the
We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook The video below was again pulled, this time due to a copyright claim by HONR Netowrk The video below was again pulled, this time due to a copyright claim by HONR Netowrk. Like this:Like Loading ¦ We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook Full Video in Higher Quality