DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – Tat's Revolution 👍

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

https://tatoott1009.com/

 

Untitled115CCC

[gview file=”http://www.justice.gov/usao/about/bicn_celebration.pdf”]

Download (PDF, 2.06MB)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

[gview file=”http://www.justice.gov/civil/cases/cobell/docs/pdf/12102010_jointmotiontoapprove.pdf”]

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
arnold-map_1862-dc-planDOC

[gview file=”http://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdf”] district_of_columbia_1901_key georgetown

PDF] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA Claims Settlement Act of 2010, and the record of these

www.justice.gov/civil/cases/cobell/docs/pdf/12102010_jointmotiontoapprove.pdf-376k-2011-04-22- Text Version

[PDF] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA been
exhaustively chronicled in district court and US 375, 382 (1886); see Act of

www.justice.gov/civil/cases/cobell/docs/pdf/01302008_fofcol.pdf-121k-2011-04-22- Text Version
[More results from www.justice.gov/civil/cases/cobell]

[PDF] 1870. (June 26)
titles, in which the concurrence of the House was requested: An act (S. No.
491) relating to the supreme court of the District of Columbia; An act

www.justice.gov/jmd/ls/legislative_histories/pl41-97/cr-4517-1870.pdf-7k-2011-07-18- Text Version

[PDF] DISTRICT District of Virginia Eastern District of Virginia
Rutherford (Court Appointed u. S. Marshal for the District of Columbia) Page
10. WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Reorganized by Act of February

www.justice.gov/marshals/readingroom/us_marshals/virginia.pdf-6k-2010-06-15- Text Version

[TEXT] ALEX NGIRAINGAS, ET AL., PETITIONERS V. FRANCISCO Q
phrase “or Territory” was added to the 1871 Act without explanation in v. Flores
de Otero, 426 US 572, 582 (1976); District of Columbia v. Carter

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1989/sg890544.txt-13k-1997-07-24- Cached

[PDF] The Availability Of Crime Victims’ Rights under the Crime
federal law or the laws of the District of Columbia. heard at any public
proceeding in the district court involving in section 3771(a)(1) of the Act to be

www.justice.gov/olc/2010/availability-crime-victims-rights.pdf-28k-2011-05-20- Text Version

[PDF] Mutual Consent Provisions in the Guam Commonwealth
6 Congress has exercised this power with respect to the District of
Columbia. The Act of February 21, 1871, 16 Stat. 419

www.justice.gov/olc/opinions/07281994_mutconst.pdf-16k-2007-08-14- Text Version

No. 01-1622: National Coalition to Save Our Mall, et al. v. Gale
Pool site in the District of Columbia and the The district court granted the motion
and dismissed petitioners’ contention that the Act’s withdrawal of

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2002/0responses/2001-1622.resp.html-6k- Cached

[PDF] NOTICE OF SECTION 5 SUBMISSION ACTIVITY UNDER THE
West Columbia Pearland Independent School District OF SECTION 5
SUBMISSION ACTIVITY UNDER THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 Notice

www.justice.gov/crt/about/vot/notices/vnote040312.pdf-34k-2012-04-04- Text Version

[PDF] United States
District of Columbia was commended by Mr Joseph Davis successful
resolution to major Freedom of Information Act lawsuit

www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usab3402.pdf-59k-2010-10-12- Text Version

US Marshals Service, History of Eastern District of Virginia
(Reorganized by Act of February 3 17, 1985 (CA) February 26, 1986 (C),
Rutherford (Court Appointed US Marshal for the District of Columbia).

www.justice.gov/marshals/district/va-e/general/history.htm-7k- Cached

[PDF] In the Supreme Court of the United States
expeditiously at the dedicated Rainbow Pool site in the District of Columbia
in a SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2002/0responses/2001-1622.resp.pdf-10k-2002-08-02- Text Version

[PDF] 1870. (June 17)
District of Columbia. the pro- visions in favor of publishers of newspapers and
periodicals contained in thesecond section of the act of August 30

www.justice.gov/jmd/ls/legislative_histories/pl41-97/cr-4547-1870.pdf-7k-2011-07-18- Text Version

[TEXT] ROBERT L. CLARKE, COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that challenges
brokerage firms under the Bank Holding Company Act (12 USC

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1985/sg850099.txt-16k-1997-07-23- Cached

Criminal Resource Manual 1871 Note on Title I
precluded the Surgeon General from fulfilling his role under the Act. In the United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the court

www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01871.htm-1k- Cached

[TEXT] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER V. WILLIAM
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held even when the jurisdiction
of the district court rested be such a concession but the 1980 Act was.

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1986/sg860392.txt-20k-1997-07-23- Cached

[TEXT] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER V. WILLIAM
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. in Mixed Tucker Act/Federal Tort
Claims Act Cases, This data,” in which case the district court “would

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1986/sg860242.txt-35k-1997-07-23- Cached
[More results from www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1986]

No. 99-1871: United States Dep’t of the Interior v. Klamath
In Soucie, the District of Columbia Circuit explained why the FOIA to address
perceived deficiencies in the procedures by which the Act had been

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2000/3mer/2mer/1999-1871.mer.aa.html-31k- Cached

[TEXT] No. 94-1915 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
the same facts have been filed in appropriate federal district courts. of Columbia,
796 F. Supp. filed an action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 and

www.justice.gov/crt/foia/readingroom/frequent_requests/ada_settlements/nc/nc1.txt-18k-2010-12-23- Cached

No. 99-1871: US Dep’t of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users
The District of Columbia Circuit confronted a the National Archives and former
President Bush, pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1999/2pet/7pet/99-1871.pet.aa.html-51k- Cached

[PDF] American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) v.
Columbia, 216 F.3d 1, 8 (DC Cir. This Court should affirm the district The Organic
Act of 1884 brought civil government to Alaska and purported to

www.justice.gov/crt/about/app/briefs/afge.pdf-44k-2010-12-14- Text Version

No. 99-1871: DOI v. Klamath Water Users – Reply (Merits)
19) that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) “specifically prohibits ex parte
contacts with agency Yet the District of Columbia Circuit sustained

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2000/3mer/2mer/1999-1871.mer.rep.html-16k- Cached

[TEXT] WILLIAM HOHRI, ET AL., PETITIONERS V. UNITED STATES
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for the reasons stated in the district
court opinion a. Petitioners argue that “not a single act of espionage

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1988/sg880390.txt-17k-1997-07-23- Cached

[TEXT] HENRY G. SPALLONE, PETITIONER V. UNITED STATES OF
Tit. I, Section 145 of the District of Columbia Appropriations
Act, 1989, Pub. L. No. 100-462, 102 Stat. 2269

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1988/sg880019.txt-38k-1997-07-23- Cached
[More results from www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1988]

[PDF] No. 11-247: Salazar v. Patchak – Petition
light of our determination that the Quiet Title Act does not UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2011/2pet/7pet/2011-0247.pet.aa.pdf-61k-2011-09-29- Text Version

[TEXT] JAYNE BRAY, ET AL., PETITIONERS V. ALEXANDRIA
as the group of victims of the tortious act.” The approach and among the various
States represented in the District of Columbia metropolitan area.

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1990/sg900229.txt-23k-1997-07-24- Cached

Civil Rights Division Home Page
Act Number: 697 Act Date: 1998 COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting
plan State: GEORGIA County: COLUMBIA Subjurisdiction: Special

www.justice.gov/crt/about/vot/notices/vnote528.html-9k- Cached

No. 03-1027: Rumsfeld v. Padilla – Petition
Sixth, Eighth, Ninth and District of Columbia Circuits, some his having sent
his agents into this district to take on the secessionist states-an act of war

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2003/2pet/7pet/2003-1027.pet.aa.html-120k- Cached

[PDF] In the Supreme Court of the United States
6 The District Court characterized its finding that Newman could act as next
friend as “a ruling that I cannot imagine will be open to serious question

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2003/2pet/7pet/2003-1027.pet.aa.pdf-180k-2004-01-28- Text Version
[More results from www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2003]

[PDF] In the Supreme Court of the United States
been overruled by Braden, and it therefore rejected the District of Columbia
Circuit’s broad under which it wages war) and * * * its act, like certain

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2007/3mer/2mer/2006-1195.mer.aa.pdf-81k-2007-10-17- Text Version

[TEXT] WILLIAM H. WEBSTER, DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL
In light of the District of Columbia Circuit’s earlier the judgment would be ‘to
restrain the Government from acting, or to compel it to act.'”); Larson v

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1987/sg870427.txt-33k-1997-07-23- Cached

No. 99-213: United States v. SCS Business & Technical Inst.
usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or Moss
Amendments to the Federal Trade Commission Act, which granted

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1999/2pet/7pet/99-0213.pet.aa.html-61k- Cached

[PDF] Bicentennial Celebration
violation of the Hobbs Act. Aiello property. Page 36. DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA Jay B. Stephens, United States Attorney The

www.justice.gov/usao/about/bicn_celebration.pdf-320k-2011-11-23- Text Version

USDOJ: US Attorney’s Office – District of Utah
and later the Edmunds-Tucker Act.” Dickson was VanZile, then the United States
District Attorney for further law instruction at Columbia University in

www.justice.gov/usao/ut/history.html-34k- Cached

No. 97-1838: Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC – Opposition
new appeal to the District of Columbia Circuit, 47 the case was on remand,
the district court applied when the [Paperwork Reduction Act] issue was

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1997/0responses/97-1838.resp.opp.html-13k- Cached

[PDF] In the Supreme Court of the United States
pending before the agency when the Paper- work Reduction Act was reenacted
on remand in a new appeal to the District of Columbia Circuit, 47

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1997/0responses/97-1838.resp.opp.pdf-21k-1998-10-29- Text Version
[More results from www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1997]

Nos. 06-1195 and 06-1196: Boumediene v. Bush / Odah v.
284 (Louisiana Territory); Act of Mar in Eisentrager had been overruled by
Braden, and it therefore rejected the District of Columbia Circuit’s broad

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2007/3mer/2mer/2006-1195.mer.aa.html-48k- Cached

[TEXT] No. 94-1867 In The Supreme Court of The United States
least 28 States, the District of Columbia, and dozens The district court decision
in United States v that has considered the validity of the Access Act.

www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1994/w941867w.txt-15k-1997-11-04- Cached

[PDF] Competition and Monopoly : Single-Firm Conduct Under
MONOPOLY: SINGLE-FIRM CONDUCT UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE
SHERMAN ACT 2008 SECTION 2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT ISSUED BY THE

www.justice.gov/atr/public/reports/236681.pdf-433k-2009-05-11- Text Version

[PDF] 100 ANNIV BOOK 11 8 2009 NT.pub
1871, railroads received an estimated 175 million The District of Columbia
District Court ruling in under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,

www.justice.gov/enrd/ENRD_Assets/public_lands_and_national_treasures.pdf-102k-2013-02-17- Text Version

 

Result Page Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Advanced Search

 

%d bloggers like this: