Texas explosions Frequency [WARFARE] Death Raaaaays

(CNN) — Investigators have not ruled out an intentional fire being behind explosions at a fertilizer plant in the small town of West that left 15 people dead, the Texas fire marshal said Thursday.

State Fire Marshal Chris Connealy said investigators were unable to rule out three possible causes, including a spark from a golf cart, an electrical short or an intentionally set fire.

“The cause cannot be proven to an acceptable level,” Connealy told reporters.

Investigators said the incident was actually two simultaneous blasts triggered by the fire. The blasts, which registered on seismographs as a magnitude 2.1 earthquake and was felt 50 miles away, caused damage to a 37-block area of the town.

Paramedic wept in April CNN interview

Giant crater marks Texas blast site

West, TX resident: We are resilient

The announcement follows news last week that authorities launched a criminal investigation into the April 17 fire and explosion in West, about 70 miles southwest of Dallas.

Authorities announced the criminal investigation last Friday, the same day investigators said a paramedic who responded to the fire was arrested on suspicion of possession of a destructive device after investigators allegedly found materials to make a pipe bomb at his home.

Federal authorities have not said whether the arrest of Bryce Reed was connected to the fire and blast, and Robert Champion of the Dallas office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives declined Thursday to discuss whether a pipe bomb could cause the damage that led to the explosions.

The state fire marshal’s office had previously ruled out four potential causes: weather, natural causes, anhydrous ammonium and ammonium nitrate in a rail car.

The powerful explosion leveled a portion of the town, damaging numerous homes, a nursing home and the town’s high school and middle school.

In that weeks that followed, scores of investigators have following up on leads. At least 60 have been on site each day and have conducted more than 400 interviews in trying to determine how the fire started and what caused the explosion, authorities said.

The West Fertilizer Co., which operated the facility, had been cited by federal regulators twice since 2006.

In 2012, the Transportation Department’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration fined West Fertilizer $5,250 for storing anhydrous ammonia in tanks that lacked the proper warning labels. The agency originally recommended a $10,000 penalty, but it was reduced after the company took corrective action.

In 2006, the EPA fined it $2,300 and told the owners to correct problems that included a failure to file a risk management program plan on time. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality also investigated a complaint about the lingering smell of ammonia around the plant the same year.

///////////////////////////////////////



PLEASE WATCH AND COPY

THIS BELOW

Copy this below and share it with EVERYONE you know! District of Columbia Act of 1871

WORST IDEA – Armed Revolt July 4 2013 WATCH THIS PEOPLE

Lazer Plasma Decontamination Weapon USED IN Waco ????

Very Smart Phone Reimagines ‘Talk to the Hand’

TOKYO – It’s not exactly the next big smartphone, but if you spend one too many hours searching for that misplaced iPhone, this could be even better.

Researchers at the University of Tokyo are developing a system that puts the mobile phone on the palm of your hand – literally. Using a special camera that combines high-speed vision and two rotational mirrors, Masatoshi Ishikawa and his team at the Ishikawa Oku Laboratory here say they’ve found a way to project a device’s display screen or keyboard onto the palm, or any other surface, so that you can operate it remotely in your home or office.

FFFFA

Ishikawa says the system can detect the movement of a three-dimensional object every two milliseconds. Put simply, the high-speed vision allows the program to track moving objects, so users would be free to walk with the phone image in palm, without the display ever shifting.

That’s not all.

The computer system developed by Ishikawa beams ultrasonic wave emitters, so the user actually feels the keyboard pressing against their skin, without anything in their hand. The sensation is the equivalent to a 3-gram or 0.1- ounce object, he says.

“You won’t need a keyboard, you won’t need to carry a smartphone, or a computer,” Ishikawa says. “You can make a call without anything.”

The concept is similar to the one featured in the movie “Total Recall” last year. In the film, Colin Farrell’s character, Douglas Quaid, uses a phone embedded beneath the skin of his palm. The phone lights up, when a call comes in, allowing Quaid to answer by putting his hand to his ear.

Ishikawa says his system is far more advanced than anything featured in Hollywood, but he has yet to allow users to make actual calls from their palms. The researcher says he expects that to become reality in a year or two.

The palm phone is the latest in a string of systems Ishikawa has developed, using high-speed vision technology. Last year, he unveiled a robotic hand designed to win the game rock-paper-scissors 100 percent of the time. Processing 1,000 frames per second, the hand moved 33 times faster than humans, staying a step ahead of the opponent.

Prior to that, Ishikawa developed a mechanical finger that could dribble the ball faster than the human eye can see. Years ago, he created a batting robot capable of hitting any ball within the strike zone, every single time.

Ishikawa now hopes to perfect the projection phone, so users can dial from their palms, and view 3-D images. The phone is strictly for indoor use only, and he doesn’t expect the complete system to be on the market for at least 5 to 6 years.

//////////////////////////////

I’m coining a new term today … “Ultrasonic-Touch” UST .

Using frequency to produce a PHYSICAL SENSATION of an actual object.

ultraound-touch

We’ve heard the conspiracy theories.. use blue beam to make a 3d hologram.. then use frequency to make it appear physical to the touch..

Well.. the physical touch part is now taken care of.

The question now becomes.. is bluebream really real?  I don’t know.

——————

The computer system developed by Ishikawa beams ultrasonic wave emitters, so the user actually feels the keyboard pressing against their skin, without anything in their hand. The sensation is the equivalent to a 3-gram or 0.1- ounce object, he says.

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/very-smart-phone-reimagines-talk-hand-151350274.html

WORST IDEA – Armed Revolt July 4 2013 WATCH THIS PEOPLE

Gun laws in the District of Columbia






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Location of Washington, D.C. in the United States

Gun laws in the District of Columbia regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the District of Columbia in the United States.[1][2]

Contents

Summary table

Subject/Law Long Guns Handguns Relevant Statutes Notes
Permit to purchase? Yes Yes The firearm registration process also serves as a permitting process.
Firearm registration? Yes Yes All firearms must be registered with the Metropolitan Police Department. A background check, training, and testing of the gun owner are required.
“Assault weapon” law? Yes Yes “Assault weapons” and .50 BMG rifles prohibited.
Magazine Capacity Restriction? Yes Yes Illegal to possess or acquire magazines of more than 10 round capacity.
Owner license required? Yes Yes The firearm registration process also serves as a licensing process.
Carry permits issued? No No Concealed carry prohibited.
Open Carry? No No Open carry prohibited.
NFA weapons restricted? Yes Yes Automatic firearms prohibited.
Peaceable journey laws? No No Possession of unregistered firearms prohibited for both residents and non-residents.

Possession of firearms

In Washington, D.C., all firearms must be registered with the police, by the terms of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975. The same law also prohibited the possession of handguns, even in private citizens’ own homes, unless they were registered before 1976. However, the handgun ban was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller. The Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment acknowledges and guarantees the right of the individual to possess and carry firearms, and therefore D.C.’s ban on handguns was unconstitutional.[3] Following the Heller decision, the Washington D.C. City Council enacted a set of rules regulating the possession of handguns in citizens’ homes. In addition to each handgun being registered with the police, the rules require that D.C. residents undergo a background check and submit fingerprints. The firearms registry photographs the applicant. Residents must take an online gun safety course, and pass a written test on the District’s gun laws. Residents must also declare where it will be kept.[4][5][6][7]

Concealed carry

The District of Columbia does not permit the concealed carrying of firearms. Open carry is also prohibited. A lawsuit was filed on August 6, 2009, to compel the district to issue permits to carry weapons.[8]

References

  1. ^ “State Gun Laws: District of Columbia”, National Rifle Association – Institute for Legislative Action. Retrieved December 30, 2012.
  2. ^ “District of Columbia Law Summary”, Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Retrieved December 30, 2012.
  3. ^ Mears, Bill (June 26, 2008). “High Court Strikes Down Gun Ban”. CNN. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  4. ^ Falcone, Michael (December 16, 2008). “Washington Council Enacts Tough Gun-Control Measure”. The New York Times. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  5. ^ Richey, Warren (March 26, 2010). “Federal Judge OKs D.C.’s Latest Set of Gun-Control Laws”. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  6. ^ Davenport, Christian (September 2, 2009). “Passing D.C.’s Rules to Get a Gun Was Hard, but the Weapon Posed Its Own Test”. The Washington Post. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  7. ^ Associated Press (December 6, 2011). “DC Council to Consider Easing Some Handgun Registration Requirements in Wake of Court Ruling”. The Washington Post. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  8. ^ SAF Sues District of Columbia over Carrying of Handguns, Second Amendment Foundation press release, saf.org. Retrieved December 9, 2011.

Communist Rules for Revolution 1919, 84 Years later we’re there

In May 1919, at Dusseldorf, Germany, the Allied Forces obtained a copy of the “Communist Rules for Revolution.” Nearly 84 years later, they have nearly succeeded in every area.

1. Corrupt the young: get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.

2. Get control of all means of publicity. Get peoples’ minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays and other trivialities.

3. Divide people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.

4. Destroy the peoples’ faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and . (speak against, condemnatory utterances)

5. Always preach ;true democracy; but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.

6. By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit; produce fear of inflation, rising prices and general discontent.

7. Foment strikes in vital industries; encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward these disorders.

8. By special argument cause a breakdown of the old moral virtues; honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.

9. Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext with a view of confiscation of them and leaving the population helpless.

America’s Destruction a Long Term Agenda

Newswatch Magazine, June 17 2004

Every one of these rules is nearly complete in the U.S. today. How close are we to the confiscation of all guns in America? We don’t know but look at the following.

In the Bristol Herald Courier, Friday, June 4, 2004, Page A5, was this headline: Mexico seeks closer ties with Russian military, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. President Vicente Fox of Mexico is a Socialist and already has ties with Cuba, China and now Russia. There is a book out that describes the silent movement of Chinese Communist troops into Mexico close to the American border. Its title is Silent Invasion.

What if this knowledge became available to the public and a cry was made for protection? Ted Koppel of Nightline, on April 7, 2004, had some interesting guests. They were former Reagan officials Edwin Meese III and Kenneth M. Duberstein; former Clinton official Sally Katzen, author James Mann, and former Bush official Richard Clarke. The subject matter was named The Armageddon Plan.

In the discussion Koppel imagines an attack that decimates the U.S. Congress. He said: “… aren’t [we] left for at least the foreseeable future with some sort of martial law anyway?”

Duberstein agrees with Koppel, adding: “YOU HAVE TO SUSPEND RIGHTS.”

Koppel continues by saying: “… And during that period, then, and given the sense of panic that is inevitable under circumstances like this, the executive branch of government takes on EXTRAORDINARY POWER, doesn’t it?”

Clarke agrees by saying: “I think in any war where Washington were destroyed, inevitably, there would be a period of, for lack of a better term, something like MARTIAL LAW. The key here is, though, that plans all call for going back to a normal three-branch system, as rapidly as possible.”

Koppel reacts to Clarke’s ideas by suggesting that this is a new idea to many leaders in Washington. NO! The federal government has been so infiltrated that they are on the verge of creating horrible circumstances that will ensure martial law with the loss of ALL of our Constitutionally guaranteed rights.

Most Americans do not realize the tremendous assault upon our Second Amendment Right to bear arms. In a trail against a private citizen from Texas, the Federal Government stated its PURPOSE was to not allow ANY citizen own guns of any kind, only the National Guard and military under the control of the Federal Government.

This would leave the population helpless to resist tyranny as our Founding Fathers told us to! They used the Swiss as an example of every able bodied male from age 16-60 to train in the proper handling of guns and were REQUIRED by law to keep them and ammunition stored in their homes to protect against tyranny. The Swiss have never been invaded or subjugated since 1291 AD as a result.

The Socialist/Communist/Secret Society members, such as Skull & Bones, that are working for world government MUST DISARM the American people to succeed. They are working overtime while our Senators and Representatives are being manipulated by panic rather than standing firm upon our Constitutional Rights.

America, you’re just too young to die!!!

////////////////////

Homeowner to cops: “Martial law has not been established in this country”

In perhaps one of the most shocking police brutality videos of recent years, police in Cotati, California respond to a call about “domestic violence” by kicking down the door of a man’s home before tazing him and his wife as they scream in agony.

The video begins with the cops standing on the man’s front lawn looking in through the window having responded to a report of a noise disturbance called in by neighbors. Despite the fact that the couple are obviously not at loggerheads and no harm is coming to anybody, the police announce that they are going to break into the house without a warrant.

“Why are you guys not coming out?,” asks one of the officers, bemused at the fact that someone wouldn’t follow orders.

“Because we don’t live in a police state, sir. Martial law has not been established in this country,” responds the homeowner.

The officer then orders the couple to get down on the ground and put their hands behind their backs, adding, “We’re gonna kick in the door.”

The cops kick down the door and enter the home with guns drawn as the homeowner exclaims, “You have no right to be in here!”

Despite the fact that the woman clearly has her hands in the air, a cop tazes her as she screams out in pain. The man is then also tazed.

The video clip has caused shockwaves across the Internet and has already gone viral along with an outpouring of support for the family.

However, others have expressed support for the police, claiming that the cops couldn’t see the children at the home and therefore didn’t know that they weren’t in danger. Under this scenario, the 4th amendment and probable cause are non-existent and the police can just break into your house and attack you in the name of “protecting the children” at any time.

“The police are allowed to kick in your door when they request you come outside to talk and you refuse and they were called to the residence because of domestic abuse,” wrote one respondent.

In reality, under Florida v. J.L. (March 28, 2000), “the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that anonymous tips are not sufficient grounds to constitute probable cause for a search. Judge Ginsburg, writing for the Supreme Court, stated, “Such an exception would enable any person seeking to harass another to set in motion an intrusive, embarrassing police search of the targeted person simply by placing an anonymous call.…”

“Who is the victim in this case? It’s not the children, who were peacefully playing in the front yard and in the home. And neither homeowner had raised a hand to the other,” writes Mac Slavo.

“In fact, the victims were the residents of the home, whose private property had been violated. The individual recording the video was reportedly tazed, detained and then arrested by police. For what?”

*********************