Tag Archives: anonymous anon anony occupy wall street together bankers banksters international usdayofrage day of rage protest demonstration mace cops nypd lapd LA los angeles New York NYC City Chicago Fed Federal
Chicago radio host says Breitbart’s death was a warning shot and that others are in danger
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Contrary to today’s release of edited and seemingly innocuous footage that shows Barack Obama making a speech at Harvard in 1991 and has already been in the public domain for years, Chicago radio host Erich “Mancow” Muller told the Alex Jones Show today that his friend Andrew Breitbart had in fact planned to release information that would “destroy Barack Obama” on March 1st, hours after his untimely death.
Muller said he was speaking with Breitbart “every other day” about a TV show he had lined up on a major network on which Breitbart would make regular appearances in a segment called “Breitbart predicts”.
“The house of cards is coming down, I have information that will destroy Barack Obama, it’s over,” Muller says Breitbart told him, and that the information would be released March 1st.
“Everybody feels the same way, that this guy was murdered,” said Muller, who attended Breitbart’s funeral yesterday. Muller pointed to the fact that Breitbart’s death was explained as “natural causes” by the media within hours before any kind of cursory investigation had been conducted.
“The guy goes for a walk in the middle of the night, he’s about to launch a big website, he’s about to bring down the house of Obama, and he’s dead,” said Muller.
Muller said he asked Breitbart whether he was afraid given the fact that he was sitting on such incendiary footage, to which Breitbart responded, “a little bit”. Muller then warned him, “they’re gonna kill you, you can’t destroy Obama’s brown shirt army like Acorn.”
Muller said his family and friends were urging him to quit, fearing that Breitbart’s death is a warning shot and that Rush Limbaugh also “may be in danger”.
Edited footage of one of the tapes that had been in Breitbart’s possession before his death was leaked today, but not by the Breitbart media empire itself, who have announced the full unedited footage, which shows Obama giving a speech about race at Harvard University in 1991, will be played on Fox News’ Hannity this evening.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
The edited film is by no means damning, suggesting that it is not the same footage Breitbart was referring to when he tipped off Muller that explosive revelations would arrive on March 1st.
Breitbart gave speeches throughout February, notably at the CPAC conference, in which he said he had video showing Obama fraternizing with “a bunch of silver pony tails” like Bill and Bernardine Dohrn (Weather Underground members), who radicalized him.
He also told Lawrence Sinclair at an event in Washington DC on February 9th, “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.”
According to former FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who was assigned to infiltrate the Weather Underground’s Central Committee, the group openly advocated the implementation of a Communist dictatorship inside the United States backed up by “re-education centers” for the recalcitrant and death camps for those who still refused to submit.
Given what Breitbart said both publicly and privately in the weeks before his death, it’s apparent that the footage released today is not what Breitbart had intended to release in the context of “destroying Barack Obama”. It remains to be seen whether such footage will ever see the light of day.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.===================================
=========================================
THE VETTING: Ben Smith Releases Selectively Edited Obama Race Video
Earlier today, Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith announcedon Twitter that video researcher Andrew Kaczynski had released “the mysterious Harvard/Obama/race video that the Breitbart folks have been talking about.”
The video, which Kaczynski says was “licensed from a Boston television station,” shows a young Barack Obama leading a protest at Harvard Law School on behalf of Prof. Derrick Bell, a radical academic tied to Jeremiah Wright–about whom we will be releasing significant information in the coming hours.
However, the video has been selectively edited–either by the Boston television station or by Buzzfeed itself. Over the course of the day, Breitbart.com will be releasing additional footage that has been hidden by Obama’s allies in the mainstream media and academia.
Breitbart.com Editor-in-Chief Joel Pollak and Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro will appear on The Sean Hannity Show to discuss the tape. The full tape will be released tonight on Fox News’ Hannity.
Andrew Breitbart’s media empire undoubtedly posed a threat to the establishment. From the takedown of New York Rep. Anthony Weiner to the outing of the USDA’s Shirley Sherrod and very public revelations about the seamy underside of ACORN, Breitbart was considered a thorn in the side of the liberal establishment.
Senators Frank Church and John Tower examine a CIA poison dart gun that causes cancer and heart attacks.
But it was his promise to release information that would critically damage Barack Obama prior to an election that really grabbed the attention of the establishment and possibly led to his assassination.
As firebrand talk show host Michael Savage said following Breitbart’s collapse on a Brentwood, California, street and his subsequent death from an apparent heart attack, he would be remiss if he didn’t suggest that the liberal gadfly was assassinated. “I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said on his nationally syndicated radio show, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”
Others insist Breitbart had a history of health issues and simply collapsed and died from a heart attack as thousands of Americans do every day. They say Savage, Alex Jones and many others who posit a Breitbart assassination are engaging in baseless conspiracy theories.
During Senate testimony in 1975 into illegal activities by the CIA, it was revealed that the agency had developed a dart gun capable of causing a heart attack. “At the first televised hearing, staged in the Senate Caucus Room, Chairman Church dramatically displayed a CIA poison dart gun to highlight the committee’s discovery that the CIA directly violated a presidential order by maintaining stocks of shellfish toxin sufficient to kill thousands,” a Senate web page explains.
“The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn’t it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony,” writes Fred Burks.
“The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.”
Burks suggests that Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings which led to a Bloomberg lawsuit against the bankster cartel, may have been assassinated with the CIA weapon.
Of course, Breitbart’s untimely death prior to the release of information that would damage the presidential campaign of Obama may be purely coincidental. If he was, however, assassinated with a frozen dart that denatures and leaves no trace, chances are we will never know what really happened to him.
Chicago radio host says Breitbart’s death was a warning shot and that others are in danger
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Contrary to today’s release of edited and seemingly innocuous footage that shows Barack Obama making a speech at Harvard in 1991 and has already been in the public domain for years, Chicago radio host Erich “Mancow” Muller told the Alex Jones Show today that his friend Andrew Breitbart had in fact planned to release information that would “destroy Barack Obama” on March 1st, hours after his untimely death.
Muller said he was speaking with Breitbart “every other day” about a TV show he had lined up on a major network on which Breitbart would make regular appearances in a segment called “Breitbart predicts”.
“The house of cards is coming down, I have information that will destroy Barack Obama, it’s over,” Muller says Breitbart told him, and that the information would be released March 1st.
“Everybody feels the same way, that this guy was murdered,” said Muller, who attended Breitbart’s funeral yesterday. Muller pointed to the fact that Breitbart’s death was explained as “natural causes” by the media within hours before any kind of cursory investigation had been conducted.
“The guy goes for a walk in the middle of the night, he’s about to launch a big website, he’s about to bring down the house of Obama, and he’s dead,” said Muller.
Muller said he asked Breitbart whether he was afraid given the fact that he was sitting on such incendiary footage, to which Breitbart responded, “a little bit”. Muller then warned him, “they’re gonna kill you, you can’t destroy Obama’s brown shirt army like Acorn.”
Muller said his family and friends were urging him to quit, fearing that Breitbart’s death is a warning shot and that Rush Limbaugh also “may be in danger”.
Edited footage of one of the tapes that had been in Breitbart’s possession before his death was leaked today, but not by the Breitbart media empire itself, who have announced the full unedited footage, which shows Obama giving a speech about race at Harvard University in 1991, will be played on Fox News’ Hannity this evening.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
The edited film is by no means damning, suggesting that it is not the same footage Breitbart was referring to when he tipped off Muller that explosive revelations would arrive on March 1st.
Breitbart gave speeches throughout February, notably at the CPAC conference, in which he said he had video showing Obama fraternizing with “a bunch of silver pony tails” like Bill and Bernardine Dohrn (Weather Underground members), who radicalized him.
He also told Lawrence Sinclair at an event in Washington DC on February 9th, “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.”
According to former FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who was assigned to infiltrate the Weather Underground’s Central Committee, the group openly advocated the implementation of a Communist dictatorship inside the United States backed up by “re-education centers” for the recalcitrant and death camps for those who still refused to submit.
Given what Breitbart said both publicly and privately in the weeks before his death, it’s apparent that the footage released today is not what Breitbart had intended to release in the context of “destroying Barack Obama”. It remains to be seen whether such footage will ever see the light of day.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.===================================
=========================================
THE VETTING: Ben Smith Releases Selectively Edited Obama Race Video
Earlier today, Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith announcedon Twitter that video researcher Andrew Kaczynski had released “the mysterious Harvard/Obama/race video that the Breitbart folks have been talking about.”
The video, which Kaczynski says was “licensed from a Boston television station,” shows a young Barack Obama leading a protest at Harvard Law School on behalf of Prof. Derrick Bell, a radical academic tied to Jeremiah Wright–about whom we will be releasing significant information in the coming hours.
However, the video has been selectively edited–either by the Boston television station or by Buzzfeed itself. Over the course of the day, Breitbart.com will be releasing additional footage that has been hidden by Obama’s allies in the mainstream media and academia.
Breitbart.com Editor-in-Chief Joel Pollak and Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro will appear on The Sean Hannity Show to discuss the tape. The full tape will be released tonight on Fox News’ Hannity.
CLOSE ENCOUNTER WITH MARS: Today, Mars is at its closest to Earth for 2012. The Red Planet is only 101 million km away and shines about six times brighter than a 1st magnitude star. Look for it in the eastern sky at sunset. The burnt-orange color of Mars is very distinctive, especially when seen from rural areas with clear skies. [sky map] [images:#1, #2, #3]
STRONG SOLAR ACTIVITY: Solar activity is now high. Big sunspot AR1429, which emerged on March
2nd, is crackling with strong flares. This morning brought the strongest so far–an X1-class eruption on March 5th at 0413 UT. NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory recorded the extreme ultraviolet flash:
Update: The explosion also hurled a bright CME into space. According to analysts at the Goddard Space Weather Lab, the CME will probably miss Earth, although it will hit Mercury and Venus. An animated forecast track shows the likely progression of the cloud.
Even if this CME misses, high-latitude sky watchers should still be alert for auroras in the nights ahead. An M2-class eruption from the same sunspot on March 4th produced another, wider CME that might yet intersect Earth. The cloud is expected to deliver a glancing blow to our planet’s magnetic field on March 6th at 04:30 UT (+/- 7 hr). Auroras alerts:text, phone.
LOOK, THEN TURN AROUND: Just after sunset, as the evening sky fades to blue, Venus and Jupiter emerge from the twilight arrestingly close together in the western sky. Martin McKenna photographed the pair on Saturday night above the moonlit ruins of Downhill Estate in Co. Derry, Northern Ireland:
GEOMAGNETIC STORM: Polar geomagnetic storms are underway following the arrival of a coronal mass ejection (CME) on March 7th at approximately 0400 UT. High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras. Aurora alerts:text, phone.
Shortly after the CME impact, a burst of Northern Lights appeared over the US-Canadian border. Shawn Malone photographed the display from the shores of Lake Superior:
“I was lucky to catch this brilliant outburst of aurora activity that was very active for close to an hour,” says Malone, who has also made a time-lapse video of the display. “The aurora had no problem shining through the moonlit skies.”
MAJOR SOLAR FLARE: Big sunspot AR1429 has unleashed another major flare. This one is the strongest yet, an X5-class eruption on March 7th at 00:28 UT. NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory recorded the extreme UV flash:
This eruption hurled a bright CME into space, shown here in a movie from the Solar Dynamics Observatory. Although the CME is not squarely Earth-directed, it appears direct enough to deliver a glancing blow to our planet’s magnetic field on March 8-9. This would add to the magnetic unrest already underway at high latitudes.
The flare also accelerated energetic protons toward Earth, triggering an S3-class solar radiation storm, in progress. Such a storm is mainly a nuisance to satellites, causing occasional reboots of onboard computers and adding noise to imaging systems. Solar flare alerts:text, phone.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Mac Slavo
SHTFPlan.com
Thursday, March 8, 2012
According to a recent study published by Space Weather: The International Journal of Research and Applications, we have roughly a 12% chance of getting hit with a solar storm so powerful that it could take down the national power grid and yield catastrophic consequences for the general population. Pete Riley, a senior scientist at Predictive Science in San Diego, is the author of the study which looks at the probability of the occurrence of extreme weather events:
Via: On the probability of occurrence of extreme space weather events
Key Points
Probability of a Carrington event occurring over next decade is ~12%
Space physics datasets often display a power-law distribution
Power-law distribution can be exploited to predict extreme events
By virtue of their rarity, extreme space weather events, such as the Carrington event of 1859, are difficult to study, their rates of occurrence are difficult to estimate, and prediction of a specific future event is virtually impossible. Additionally, events may be extreme relative to one parameter but normal relative to others. In this study, we analyze several measures of the severity of space weather events (flare intensity, coronal mass ejection speeds)…
…
By showing that the frequency of occurrence scales as an inverse power of the severity of the event, and assuming that this relationship holds at higher magnitudes, we are able to estimate the probability that an event larger than some criteria will occur within a certain interval of time in the future. For example, the probability of another Carrington event occurring within the next decade is ∼12%.
The 1859 Carrington Event, as described by Wired Science, may have been a marvel to observers and caused some setbacks in the developing telegraph infrastructure at the time, but a similar occurrence today could be a global game changer:
At the time of the Carrington Event, telegraph stations caught on fire, their networks experienced major outages and magnetic observatories recorded disturbances in the Earth’s field that were literally off the scale.
In today’s electrically dependent modern world, a similar scale solar storm could have catastrophic consequences. Auroras damage electrical power grids and may contribute to the erosion of oil and gas pipelines. They can disrupt GPS satellites and disturb or even completely black out radio communication on Earth.
During a geomagnetic storm in 1989, for instance, Canada’s Hydro-Quebec power grid collapsed within 90 seconds, leaving millions without power for up to nine hours.
The potential collateral damage in the U.S. of a Carrington-type solar storm might be between $1 trillion and $2 trillion in the first year alone, with full recovery taking an estimated four to 10 years, according to a 2008 report from the National Research Council.
The post-storm effects of such an event are underestimated by the majority of the world’s population, including our political leadership. Like an electro magentic pulse attack, according to the National Research Council a massive enough solar storm could have long term effects that ”would likely include, for example, disruption of the transportation, communication, banking, and finance systems, and government services; the breakdown of the distribution of potable water owing to pump failure; and the loss of perishable foods and medications because of lack of refrigeration.”
The worst case scenario has been outlined by the Center for Security Policy, which suggests that an EMP, or a solar storm that results in similar magnetic discharge across the United States, could potentially leave 90% of Americans dead within the first year:
“Within a year of that attack, nine out of 10 Americans would be dead, because we can’t support a population of the present size in urban centers and the like without electricity,” said Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy. “And that is exactly what I believe the Iranians are working towards.”
In the documentary Urban Danger, Congressman Roscoe Bartlett warns of the threat posed by a downed power grid and urges his fellow citizens to take action to protect themselves for the inevitable results that would follow:
We could have events in the future where the power grid will go down and it’s not, in any reasonable time, coming back up. For instance, if when the power grid went down some of our large transformers were destroyed, damaged beyond use, we don’t make any of those in this country. They’re made overseas and you order one and 18 months to two years later they will deliver it. Our power grid is very vulnerable. It’s very much on edge. Our military knows that.
…
There are a number of events that could create a situation in the cities where civil unrest would be a very high probability. And, I think that those who can, and those who understand, need to take advantage of the opportunity when these winds of strife are not blowing to move their families out of the city.
Source: Congressman Warns: “Those Who Can, Should Move Their Families Out Of the City”
For many, a 1 in 8 chance of a catastrophic event occurring in a decade’s time may be nothing to worry about.
For the emergency, disaster and preparedness minded individual, however, a massive solar storm with the potential to take out our modern day power grid and utility infrastructure is just one in a variety of potentially catastrophic natural and man-made scenarios that could lead to the collapse of life in America as we know it today.
Though any given event on its own may have a low probability of occurrence, when combined with other potentialities like economic collapse, currency collapse, global or regional military conflict, Super EMP, political destabilization, massive earthquakes (such as on the New Madrid fault), Tsunamis, asteroids, pandemic, and cyber attacks the odds of a game changing paradigm shift in our lifetime’s rise significantly.
Robert Wanek RobertWanekReports.com March 3, 2012 The fact Mitt couldn’t address a short question about the NDAA and the Patriot Act is telling enough. I certainly don’t want a president whose Secret Service detail removes voters who voice their opinions, … Continue reading →
Richard Silverstein Tuesday, February 28, 2012 There have been endless recent visits to Israel from high-ranking U.S. officials regarding the Iran issue, including Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and most recently National Security Advisor Tom Donilon. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgmTh3RTjUs The AP reports that during … Continue reading →
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Monday, February 27, 2012
Lawmakers in Wyoming have introduced a bill that would compel the state to prepare for a complete collapse of the federal government, laying plans for an alternate currency, a standing army raised via a military draft, and an aircraft carrier.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“House Bill 85 passed on first reading by a voice vote. It would create a state-run government continuity task force, which would study and prepare Wyoming for potential catastrophes, from disruptions in food and energy supplies to a complete meltdown of the federal government,” reports the Wyoming Star-Tribune.
Compared to the rest of the country, Wyoming’s public finances are in a relatively good condition, a fact that has spurred lawmakers to protect the state against contagion from other areas that could develop in the aftermath of a massive financial collapse.
The bill (PDF) lays the groundwork for how the state would respond in the event of a sudden devaluation of the dollar or “a situation in which the federal government has no effective power or authority over the people of the United States.”
“I don’t think there’s anyone in this room today what would come up here and say that this country is in good shape, that the world is stable and in good shape — because that is clearly not the case,” state Rep. Lorraine Quarberg, R-Thermopolis, said. “To put your head in the sand and think that nothing bad’s going to happen, and that we have no obligation to the citizens of the state of Wyoming to at least have the discussion, is not healthy.”
The bill has to pass two more House votes before it can be considered by the Senate. If passed, the task force would have until December 1, 2012 to submit a report to the governor detailing the continuity of government plan.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
While authorities at both the state and federal level are making preparations for social dislocation, with FEMA recently ordering $1 billion dollars worth of dehydrated food, a total of 420 million meals, Americans who buy food supplies in bulk are being characterized as potential terrorists by the FBI.
Continuity of government plans implemented at the federal level are so sensitive that when the plan was last updated in 2007, Congressman Peter DeFazio was barred from seeing the details despite being a sitting member of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Peter DeFazio (D – OR) was asked by his constituents to see what was contained within the classified portion of the White House’s plan for operating the government after a catastrophic terrorist attack, but was denied access, leading him to comment, “Maybe the people who think there’s a conspiracy out there are right.”
Five years later, the biggest threat posed to America’s survival in its current form of government stems not from terrorists but from the country’s huge unsustainable national debt and the possibility of another economic collapse.
A USA Today article published yesterday quoted three separate financial experts who all concur that the worst of the financial turmoil is yet to come, with trend forecaster Gerald Celente warning of an “economic 9/11″ that will provoke mass civil unrest fueled by anti-government sentiment.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
2012 STATE OF WYOMING 12LSO-0044
1 HB0085
HOUSE BILL NO. HB0085
Government continuity.
Sponsored by: Representative(s) Miller, Burkhart, Davison,
Edmonds, Jaggi, Kroeker, McKim, Peasley,
Quarberg and Teeters and Senator(s) Jennings
and Peterson
A BILL
for
1 AN ACT relating to governmental studies; providing for a
2 task force to study governmental continuity in case of a
3 disruption in federal government operations; providing for
4 a report; providing appropriations; and providing for an
5 effective date.
6
7 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
8
9 Section 1.
10
11 (a) There is created a government continuity task
12 force consisting of the following members:
13
14 (i) Two (2) senators appointed by the president
15 of the senate;
2012 STATE OF WYOMING 12LSO-0044
2 HB0085
1
2 (ii) Two (2) representatives appointed by the
3 speaker of the house;
4
5 (iii) The director of the department of homeland
6 security or his designee;
7
8 (iv) The attorney general or his designee;
9
10 (v) The adjutant general or his designee;
11
12 (vi) The director of the department of
13 agriculture or his designee; and
14
15 (vii) The director of the oil and gas
16 conservation commission or his designee.
17
18 (b) The task force shall study potential impacts on
19 Wyoming of, and preparation of the government and the
20 people of Wyoming for, a potential disruption of the United
21 States federal government including, but not limited to:
22
2012 STATE OF WYOMING 12LSO-0044
3 HB0085
1 (i) Potential effects of the rapid decline of
2 the United States dollar and the ability to quickly provide
3 an alternative currency;
4
5 (ii) Potential effects of a situation in which
6 the federal government has no effective power or authority
7 over the people of the United States;
8
9 (iii) Potential effects of a constitutional
10 crisis;
11
12 (iv) Coordination between the governor’s office,
13 Wyoming national guard and any federal military in Wyoming;
14
15 (v) Potential effects of a disruption in food
16 distribution;
17
18 (vi) Potential effects of a disruption in energy
19 distribution.
20
21 (c) The task force shall submit a report and
22 recommendations with respect to the issues specified in
23 subsection (b) of this section to the governor and the
24 legislature by December 1, 2012.
2012 STATE OF WYOMING 12LSO-0044
4 HB0085
1
2 (d) Members of the task force who are legislators
3 shall be paid salary, per diem and mileage as provided in
4 W.S. 28-5-101 for their official duties as members of the
5 task force. Members of the task force who are state
6 employees shall not be paid any additional salary for their
7 official duties as members of the task force. The
8 legislative service office shall staff the task force.
9
10 (e) There is appropriated from the general fund:
11
12 (i) Eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000.00) to
13 the legislative service office for purposes of this act and
14 payment of salary, per diem and mileage for legislative
15 task force members;
16
17 (ii) Fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000.00) to
18 the governor’s office for payment of authorized per diem
19 and mileage for nonlegislative task force members.
20
2012 STATE OF WYOMING 12LSO-0044
5 HB0085
1 Section 2. This act is effective immediately upon
2 completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law
3 as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming
4 Constitution.
5
6 (END)
Concerns over martial law in America on a par with Islamic extremism
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Friday, February 24, 2012
An L.A. Times report which characterizes the Sovereign Citizen movement as “a major threat” on a par with Islamic extremism infers that “more than 100,00 Americans” are domestic terrorists as a result of their affiliation with the group.
Sovereign citizen’ movement now on FBI’s radar, frames the belief that “the U.S. is essentially under martial law,” along with support for reintroducing the gold standard, as political views indicative of violent extremism.
The report quotes Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center, who in one fell swoop demonizes “more than 100,00 Americans” as domestic terrorists.
“This is a movement that has absolutely exploded,” said Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit organization based in Montgomery, Ala., that tracks domestic terrorists and hate groups. More than 100,000 Americans have aligned themselves with the sovereign citizens, the center said.
Potok specializes in seizing upon tragedies to push his organization’s political agenda. Immediately after the shooting of US Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Potok took to the airwaves to blame the attempted assassination on the “radical right,” when the shooter, Jared Loughner, was described by those who knew him as a “left-wing pothead”.
Potok has been described as “the Boy Who Cried Right-Wing Terrorist” because of his obsession with exploiting almost every act of violence to impugn conservatives.
“The fact that he is consistently wrong about, well, just about everything — from the political views of the supposed right wingers to the supposedly violent nature of conservative groups to the mere presence of violent crime — does not seem to dissuade Old Media from using him to smear conservatives,” explains Lachlan Markay.
The SPLC makes tens of millions of dollars every year demonizing politically active Americans as domestic terrorists, making it the most profitable “civil rights charity” in America, and yet the establishment media continues to treat the organization and its mouthpieces like Potok as impartial observers.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Of course, any political group with such a substantial membership is bound to contain a smattering of crazies – the report claims members of the Sovereign Citizen movement have killed six police officers over the course of the last 12 years – but to demonize over 100,000 Americans as violent terrorists on a par with Al-Qaeda because they express concerns about the militarization of law enforcement is clearly asinine.
Unfortunately, it’s now par for the course.
Despite the fact that the federal government was forced to back down on framing Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as terrorists under the infamous MIAC report, the rush to denounce legitimate political beliefs as thought crimes, or even mundane behaviors, by insinuating they are shared by terrorists, has accelerated in recent months.
Under the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program, the bulk purchase of food is labeled as a potential indication of terrorist activity, as is using cash to pay for a cup of coffee, and showing an interest in web privacy when using the Internet in a public place.
As we have documented on numerous occasions, the federal government routinely characterizes mundane behavior as extremist activity or a potential indicator of terrorist intent. As part of its ‘See Something, Say Something’ campaign, the Department of Homeland Security educates the public that generic activities performed by millions of people every day, including using a video camera, talking to police officers, wearing hoodies, driving vans, writing on a piece of paper, and using a cell phone recording application,” are all potential signs of terrorist activity.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Electronic voting machines make it easy for the bankers to ensure Ron Paul doesn’t win the primary elections like South Carolina and Florida! In places like Maine and Iowa it is much harder for them to commit their fraud. Ron Paul 2012!!! THEY CAN’T STOP A LANDSLIDE!!! – SMILEY CHRIS
Going public with long time secret unconstitutional operationsSteve Watson Infowars.com February 23, 2012
A high ranking Pentagon lawyer argued Wednesday that US citizens accused of having ties to terror groups can legitimately be targeted for assassination.
In a speech at Yale Law School, Jeh C. Johnson, the Defense Department general counsel, also said that US courts do not have the right to review such cases, or pass judgment on decisions taken by the Executive branch on such matters.
“Belligerents who also happen to be U.S. citizens do not enjoy immunity where non-citizen belligerents are valid military objectives,” said Johnson.
According to a report in The New York Times, while not discussing detail of last year’s killing of US born Islamist radical Anwar Al-Awlaki, “Johnson invoked a lawsuit filed by Mr. Awlaki’s father before the killing that had sought an injunction against targeting his son, citing with approval a district judge’s decision to dismiss the case and saying that targeting decisions are not suited to court review because they must be made quickly and based on fast-evolving intelligence.”
“Within the executive branch the views and opinions of the lawyers on the president’s national security team are debated and heavily scrutinized, and a legal review of the application of lethal force is the weightiest judgment a lawyer can make,” Johnson said. “And, when these judgments start to become easy, it is time for me to return to private law practice.”
The US government has long operated a policy of targeted killing against so called enemies of the state. However, it is one thing to be carrying out such targeted killings in secret, it is quite another to publicly proclaim such actions as legitimate.
Earlier this month, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta acknowledged that the U.S. has assumed the authority to conduct targeted assassinations of U.S. citizens on the recommendations of the CIA Director and the Secretary of Defense and pursuant to the President’s authorization:
President Obama followed up those sentiments by publicly defending the US government’s secret killing program:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7396830n
The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, and the CIA, demanding the release of information pertaining to the secret program, and in particular the deaths of accused Al Qaeda leaders Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Kahn, as well as Awlaki’s 16 year old son, in 2011. All three were US citizens.
“Our government’s deliberate and premeditated killing of American terrorism suspects raises profound questions that ought to be the subject of public debate,” Nathan Freed Wessler of the ACLU wrotein a statement.
“Unfortunately the Obama administration has released very little information about the practice — its official position is that the targeted killing program is a state secret — and some of the information it has released has been misleading.” Wessler added.
The ACLU is specifically seeking to uncover a Department of Justice memo that is said by government officials to have provided the legal justification for the killing of a U.S. citizen without due process.
Also in question is a CIA “kill list” that Awlaki is said to have been added to more than a year before he was killed. The ACLU is demanding information on the process by which Americans have been added to the secret list. A previous Freedom of Information Act request for the material was ignored by the government.
“The public has a right to know the evidence and legal basis for the deliberate targeted killing of U.S. citizens,” the ACLU’s Wessler said. “So chilling a power must be opened to public scrutiny and debate.”
——————————————————————
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Israel Backing Off Iran Attack?
Israeli President Shimon Peres will tell Obama early next month that he believes his country should not launch an attack on Iran in response to its nuclear program, Haaretz reports.
Peres said the Israeli government should not engage in “unnecessary warmongering” and the issue should fall on the United States and the superpowers.
Peres will meet with Obama a day before Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who will arrive in the United States following a visit to Canada. “When Obama meets with Netanyahu, he will already know what Peres thinks – information he will use in his meeting with Netanyahu,” writes Yossi Verter.
“High level sources in Israel have just leaked a sanitized version of the President’s plan to the Israeli press,” writes Michael Carmichael. “But, there is much more to the story. In his meeting at the White House, Peres will inform Obama that Netanyahu has performed poorly in his handling of the Iran nuclear crisis and that bellicose statements from the Prime Minister’s cabinet have been both self-intimidating and self-destructive.”
Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman have pushed hard for an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities and the possible backing down indicated by Peres comes as a serious loss of face.
Lieberman, however, is unwilling to concede defeat. He said in an interview yesterday that Israel will not bow to U.S. and Russian pressure in deciding whether to attack Iran. He told Israeli television the attack “is not their business.”
Earlier this month, Obama reportedly convinced Netanyahu to allow some time for sanctions to work against Iran. “I don’t think that Israel has made a decision on what they need to do. I think they, like us, believe that Iran has to stand down on its nuclear weapons program,” Obama said.
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Despite his runaway success in terms of straw poll victories, campaign contributions and grass roots energy, a plethora of evidence strongly indicates that Ron Paul is being cheated out of winning any of the Republican caucuses, with the GOP establishment desperate to prevent the Texan Congressman from building any kind of momentum that the likes of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum have been afforded.
===============================================
Even the establishment media is now being forced to report that “Ron Paul Might Have Won Maine,” with evidence of potential vote fraud targeted against Ron Paul prompting the state’s GOP chairman Charles Webster to ask for a recount.
With just 84 per cent of the votes being counted, and with many towns and counties showing strong support for Ron Paul having not yet cast their votes, the media along with the Republican establishment brazenly declared Mitt Romney to be the winner, despite him having just a 194 vote lead over Ron Paul.
Erroneous reports of a snowstorm were cited as a pretext to cancel the caucus in Washington County, an area heavily dominated by Paul supporters, delaying the vote for a week. Voters in the county are still waiting to cast their ballots.
“That’s right. A prediction of 3-4 inches–that turned into nothing more than a dusting–was enough for a local GOP official to postpone the caucuses just so the results wouldn’t be reported tonight,” spokesman Gary Howard wrote in an E-mail to supporters, adding that even the local Girl Scouts’ meeting survived the weather.
Local reporters in Maine also revealed how the vote for most Waldo County towns was entered as “0”, as if no one had turned out to vote.
Rachel Maddow expanded on the reports in a feature on MSNBC, pointing out that when one town in Waldo attempted to call in its results, State officials said they already had results from the town showing Romney had won, when in reality that wasn’t the case and in fact Ron Paul had won.
The controversy in Maine follows the admitted mistake in Iowa where Mitt Romney was announced as the winner and yet a later recount found that Rick Santorum had actually beaten him. The kind of momentum Santorum was allowed to build as a result of that revision is unlikely to be afforded to Ron Paul in Maine.
The vote in Iowa was labeled by one observer as the “biggest fraud since Kennedy stole the West Virginia Primary”.
Before the vote took place, in a state where pre-primary polling showed Ron Paul in with a good chance of taking top spot, Republican strategist Dee Dee Benkie told a radio show that GOP insiders had resolved to prevent Ron Paul from winning the primary.
“They’re not going to want him to get number one, it’s very bad for Iowa, it’s terrible,” said Benkie, confirming the host’s claim that Iowa District Chairmen are organizing voting blocks to sabotage Paul’s chances by offering them sweetheart deals in return for voting against Paul.
The debacle in Nevada also clearly indicates that Ron Paul was cheated out of victory in the SIlver State. Despite results from every other state primary showing Ron Paul at least doubling his vote tally compared to 2008, for example climbing from 16,000 to 78,000 votes in South Carolina, In Nevada Paul received just a few hundred more votes than he achieved in 2008, leaving him with a third placed finish.
A d v e r t i s e m e
n t
“Ron Paul who took second in Nevada in 2008 with 6,087 votes, only increased his support by 1.4% to just 6,175 in the 2012 results, despite all of the excitement, all the money spent, which was a lot more,” reports Money Trends Research. “In fact, the Paul campaign had brochures and volunteers almost knock on every door in Nevada this time around. Nevada is also very fertile ground for a candidate like Ron Paul, many people in Nevada just want to be left alone by the government, Ron Paul opposes taxing tips, seeing that they are not really income, but gifts, you would think this would go over real well in Las Vegas.”
As we documented before the Nevada primary, Paul’s campaign, after having finished second in the state behind Mitt Romney in 2008, poured huge amounts of energy and funding into the 2012 race, whereas Romney hardly had any ground campaign at all, and yet Romney ended up taking the state by a landslide.
Massive evidence of vote fraud subsequently emerged. News networks had announced Romney as the landslide winner before votes from Clark County – the largest county in Nevada representing more than 60 percent of the state’s voters – had even been counted. When CNN aired live footage of the votes being counted from one of the caucuses in Clark County, it was clear that Ron Paul had handily defeated Romney, and this in a “precinct full of Jewish and extremely Christian voters, two of Ron Paul’s worst demographics.”
“For five minutes, CNN sat in silence as the Republican precinct captain shouted out each vote while dozens of tabulators sat nearby keeping track,” wrote Mark Wachtler. Unfolding one sheet at a time, the man yelled, “Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul.”
The final tally showed that Ron Paul had defeated Romney by 183 to 45, in a precinct dominated by a demographic that wouldn’t even be expected to support Paul. Extrapolating this result statewide would have given Paul a clear victory, and yet Mitt Romney’s “landslide” victory vote figure barely changed throughout the whole night of ballot counting and was confirmed after a “private” vote count by the GOP establishment.
“Many had watched the results being tabulated live on national TV just as this author had,” writes Wachtler. “We all saw Ron Paul’s overwhelming victory in that part of Clark County. It’s unimaginable to believe that in the same county, a candidate could win overwhelmingly when the votes were counted live on TV, but lose so badly when the votes were counted by the Party establishment behind closed doors.”
This compendium of evidence, and the information presented above is merely scratching the surface, illustrates the fact that Ron Paul’s failure to win any of the primaries despite his massive financial backing and grass roots support, is almost certainly a result of vote fraud on behalf of the GOP establishment, which has conspired in almost every state to cheat Ron Paul out of building the kind of momentum that would have provided him the opportunity to challenge Mitt Romney for the Republican nomination.
Watch the clip below in which Alex Jones summarizes the case for vote fraud being used to target Ron Paul.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
On February 17, Patrick Buchanan wrote that it was the “incessant clamor from the left” that resulted in his removal as a political analyst from MSNBC.
But as a recent interview with RT shows, it is not Buchanan’s supposed “white supremacist ideology,” as Color of Change ludicrously charged, that got him fired, but his common sense views on U.S. foreign policy, views that often intersect with the views of another pariah and thorn in the side of the establishment, Ron Paul.
As the drums of war grow stronger, the establishment media, including a supposedly liberal establishment, are purging their ranks of critics like Buchanan. In a normal, non-Bizarro world, Ron Paul would be an ideal candidate for antiwar Democrats. Instead, he is portrayed by the corporate media (when he is portrayed at all) as a dangerous crank who would allow al-Qaeda to run rampant.
As Patrick Buchanan notes, what happens in Iran and Syria is none of our business and it certainly does not endanger our national security. How is it, Buchanan muses, the U.S. is worried about non-existent nuclear weapons in Iran when Israel has 300 or more sophisticated nukes and the systems to deliver them?
Coverage from the Veterans For Ron paul march on the White House yesterday. Follow @tatoott1009 !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=”//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js”;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,”script”,”twitter-wjs”);
EAST MACHIAS, Maine — Texas Congressman Ron Paul was the top choice by a two-to-one margin in four presidential preference polls conducted by Republicans in Maine on Saturday as the state winds up its controversial GOP caucuses.
In Washington County’s supercaucus, Paul attracted 163 votes to Mitt Romney’s 80, and in the town of Hancock, in the county of the same name, Paul received 41 votes to Romney’s 16. Paul also picked up four more votes to Romney’s two in Clinton, which also caucused Saturday morning, and 19 votes to Romney’s seven in Eastbrook.
Rick Santorum attracted 57 votes in Washington County, 17 votes in Hancock and 8 votes in Eastbrook. Gingrich finished last in all three caucuses with 4 votes in Washington County, 9 in Hancock and none in Eastbrook. Neither candidate received any votes in Clinton.
The town of Castine will caucus March 3.
The caucus in East Machias included all Washington County Communities.
Saturday morning’s caucuses in Hancock represented the communities of Fletcher’s Landing, Gouldsboro, Hancock, Lamoine, Sorrento, Sullivan, Waltham and Winter Harbor and Saturday afternoon’s caucuses in Eastbrook included Amherst, Aurora, Eastbrook, Franklin, Mariaville and Osborn.
The Washington County caucuses were originally scheduled for the prior Saturday, but were postponed because of an expected storm.
Despite the lack of a caucus in Washington County and other local caucuses that had yet to be held, Maine Republican Party Chairman Charlie Webster last Saturday announced that Romney had won the state’s nonbinding presidential preference poll.
Paul refused to concede the state until all communities had voted, including Washington County.
Since then, Maine has received national attention for its Republican caucuses, in part due to a lull in national political events that made Maine the only state to watch and in part due to issues that some say have disenfranchised caucus-goers.
Early last week, Webster said that votes from Washington County and parts of Hancock County that had not yet caucused would not be counted because the caucuses would be held after the party’s Feb. 11 deadline.
On Thursday, the party changed course and said the Washington County results would be included in the state total. Party leadership also asked town committee chairs to resubmit their results.
On Friday, the state GOP released revised results, which it said showed Romney had a slightly larger lead over Paul.
In East Machias Saturday afternoon, it was standing room only in the Washington Academy gymnasium.
Washington County GOP Committee Chairman Chris Gardner opened the caucus with this observation: “As you can see by the numbers,” he said, “this is a county that needs to be counted.”
Maine State Senate President Kevin Raye, a Washington County resident who has endorsed Romney, called the turnout “magnificent,” but said he wasn’t surprised.
“I thought it would turn out like this,” he said, before taking the stage to make his pitch for support as he mounts his campaign for Maine’s 2nd Congressional District seat now held by Democrat Mike Michaud.
Saturday’s caucuses in Hancock opened at 10 a.m. with prayer and the pledge of allegiance and featured speakers in support of Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul and Mitt Romney. When the microphone was offered to a supporter of Rick Santorum, no one came forward.
Hancock County Republican Committee Chairman Eric White assured caucus-goers that their presidential preference poll votes would be tallied when the GOP State Committee resolves the controversial process of counting votes from throughout the state. “My job is to make sure every vote gets counted,” White said. “We’re going to be included.”
BDN editor William P. Davis contributed to this report.
CORRECTION:
Because of an editor’s error, an earlier version of this article misstated the number of votes for Rick Santorum in the Hancock poll. Santorum received 17 votes, not 16.
ALERT ! = tatoott1009.com.avi Republican Establishment Excludes Ron Paul From 2012 CPAC Event
Republican Establishment Excludes Ron Paul From 2012 CPAC Event
* The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store
Romney, Gingrich, Santorum to be keynote speakers but Paul absent
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Despite winning the event’s annual straw poll for the last two years running, Ron Paul has seemingly been excluded from this year’s CPAC conference, with Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich announced as keynote speakers but Paul appearing nowhere on the roster.
The exclusion of Paul is likely a maneuver by GOP insiders to re-align CPAC, the biggest annual conservative confab, with the Republican establishment and prevent an embarrassing straw poll defeat for likely presidential pick Mitt Romney, who Paul beat in 2010 and 2011.
According to the CPAC website, fellow presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum will all address the event scheduled to take place Feb. 8-11 in Washington, but Ron Paul will be absent.
“Although a combination of factors might be at play, including Paul’s focus on the Maine caucuses, a changing of the guard at the top of CPAC’s management team is likely behind Paul’s exclusion,” notes Stephen Woodward.
Indeed, the selection of former chairman of the Florida Republican Party Al Cardenas to lead CPAC has brought with it a decidedly neoconservative flavor to the 2012 event.
Besides Romney and Gingrich, the likes of Ann Coulter, John Bolton, Sen. Mitch McConnell, Herman Cain and Rick Perry will all speak at the conference.
During a post CPAC 2011 interview, American Conservative Union (ACU) chief Cardenas put Ron Paul supporters on notice by warning them that they would not be invited to the 2012 event if they failed to act with “civility” after previous speakers Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were booed by Paul activists.
The change in direction seemingly stems from a revolt, characterized by Politico as a “conservative civil war,” that preceded last year’s conference fueled by concerns expressed by establishment Republicans that the conference was turning “libertarian”.
* A d v e r t i s e m e n t *
Former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, who boycotted the 2010 and 2011 conferences because of the attendance of Ron Paul and his supporters, is set to return to speak at the 2012 event.
CPAC’s move to marginalize true conservatives like Ron Paul also stems from concerns that the rival Values Voter Summit is gaining more prominence within establishment Republican circles.
Paul has won the CPAC straw poll for the past two years running and has spoke at the last three conferences.
Following his victory last year, Fox News erroneously reported that Paul had been booed by the audience when his win was announced. In reality, Fox played footage from the previous year’s event when Mitt Romney supporters had loudly booed the result and Paul supporters had been absent due to a Campaign for Liberty meeting running late.
Although Ron Paul supporters have presumably been uninvited because they booed Cheney and Rumsfeld, Romney fans who booed Paul will be in attendance at CPAC 2012, highlighting the hypocrisy behind Paul’s exclusion.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Obama Signed Executive Order Declaring War On Iran
Obama Signed Executive Order Declaring War On Iran
Collapse Network February 10, 2012
On February 5, 2012, President Obama invoked the NDAA, which authorizes the use of military force, and issues an executive order declaring the “threat” of Iran a National Emergency. The video below shows this issuance of President Obama executive order which declares Iran’s threat to cut off oil supplies a national emergency.
The executive order directs all government agencies to respond immediately to the threat. It further invokes the authority of the 2012 NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) which gives the President the power to launch military action against any nation without the approval of Congress. Ironically, the State of Emergency order also accuses the Iranian central bank of deceptive banking practices.
See video of Executive Order, citing section 1245 of the NDAA:
Israel Will Commit Suicide By Attacking Iran (And Allow The Globalists To Pick Up The Pieces)
The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store
Saman Mohammadi Infowars.com February 11, 2012
“[Discussing the effects of the Genesis torpedo] McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we’re intelligent enough to… suppose… what if this thing were used where life already exists? Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.
McCoy: Its “new matrix”? Do you have any idea what you’re saying? Spock: I was not attempting to evaluate its moral implications, Doctor. As a matter of cosmic history, it has always been easier to destroy than to create. McCoy: Not anymore; now we can do both at the same time! According to myth, the Earth was created in six days. Now, watch out! Here comes Genesis! We’ll do it for you in six minutes! Spock: Really, Dr. McCoy. You must learn to govern your passions; they will be your undoing. Logic suggests… McCoy: Logic? My God, the man’s talking about logic; we’re talking about universal Armageddon! You green-blooded, inhuman…” – Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982).
In the last six months, tensions have risen between Israel and Iran. Israel has assassinated numerous Iranian nuclear scientists and Iranian military officials, including the founder of Iran’s missile program, Major General Hassan Moghaddam.
So far, Iran has not retaliated against Israel’s repeated acts of aggression and terrorism. But the spirit of revenge is alive in Tehran. While it is hard to tell what kind of manifestation Iran’s spiritual anger will take, everyone realizes that a retaliation is in order and completely justified.
Throughout Israel’s campaign of terror and provocations against Iran, the Obama administration has remained in the background, quietly minding its own business.
Washington’s compliance towards Israel has puzzled and aggravated many people, including world leaders who believe the time has come to get tough with Israel. Anyone who is paying the least bit of attention to statements on Israel and Iran by U.S. government officials know they are contradictory and anti-reality.
American author and journalist Mark Perry, who made serious waves in the Israel-Iran debate last month with his piece in Foreign Policy called, ‘False Flag,’ says that official U.S. government statements are written for a number of domestic and foreign audiences. So when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told CBS’ Face The Nation last month that Iran is not building a nuclear bomb, he wanted to reassure Iranian leaders that things are under control in Washington and that the crazies are not totally guiding America’s Iran policy.
As far as words go, the Obama administration has proven that it can pull off the high-wire act of balancing U.S. interests and Israel’s ambitions. But this is a deadly game that Washington is playing. President Obama is gambling with the lives of Americans and citizens around the world.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, said that President Obama should make a public statement in which he warns Iran against raising tensions and guarantees that America will not attack Iran or allow any attack to take place. This move would isolate an already weakened Israel and force its lunatic leaders to reflect on its current terrorist strategy towards Iran and rethink Israel’s overall Middle East policy.
Brzezinski offered his advice to President Obama and top administration officials on the Chris Matthews show on February 3, 2012. Here is the exchange between Matthews and Brzezinski:
Matthews: Is there something that could be worse than Iran having a weapon. In other words, when you make the calculation on consequences, is there any way you would decide ‘Well, alright, we can live with a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranians’ because it’s better than what?
Brzezinski: The answer is very simple: war. Because it’s very easy to start a war, it’s very difficult to end it on your own terms. And it tends to produce unforeseen consequences.
Look, the Israelis have the so-called nuclear deterrent. We have an enormous nuclear deterrent. The notion that somehow or other the Iranians, who have existed for three thousand years, are going to commit public suicide the first moment they have a bomb is really ludicrous. Gary Sick, who is a major significant expert on Iran, has produced a list since 1994 of annual Israeli predictions that next year Iran will have the bomb. So I think we can take their predictions with a little bit of caution.
Moreover, their public opinion is not first strike. The majority of American Jews are not first strike. . .I think we’re dealing here with a right-wing government with rather one-sided notions of what security is, and perhaps with a somewhat irresponsible attitude about the consequences of their actions for us. Because the Iranians, if attacked, are not going to retaliate effectively against Israel because they can not. They’ll retaliate against us because they’ll see us as the sponsors. So, our troops in Afghanistan will pay the price and our disengagement may become very difficult to pursue. We’ll have a mess in Iraq again. There could be difficulties in the Persian Gulf. The price of oil could go up. The global economy could be hurt. American taxpayers will pay five bucks per gallon. The consequences for us could be extremely serious.
Matthews: But Dr. Brzezinski can Israel survive if it’s known by its own people it protects, perhaps future immigrants to Israel, that they’re going into a country that’s under a basically a firing zone from Iran, that any moment one of the Mullahs could decide to attack, maybe irrationally.
Brzezinski: Look, we lived in that situation for several decades, with an enemy who could wipe out much of America in a few minutes.
They don’t have the bomb yet. We’re negotiating with them. I think part of the Israelis’ concern is that we may make an arrangement with the Iranians that doesn’t humiliate them, and doesn’t force them to capitulate totally.
Matthews: What’s in U.S. interest?
Brzezinski: I think in the U.S. interest it is absolutely imperative that Israel be secure, but in a Middle East which is not at war. And we can accomplish that. We can first of all issue a public statement that any threat by Iran against any state in the Middle East will be viewed as a threat against us. That in itself would be a very major deterrent. And I think we can at the same time continue negotiating with Iranians perhaps about some arrangement in which they’ll continue their nuclear program but under effective international inspection. And some progress is moving in that direction.
Matthews: How do you save their pride?
Brzezinski: Well, by agreeing to them having a nuclear program.
Matthews: It’s not weaponized?
Brzezinski: It’s not weaponized. The enrichment is not up to a certain level that really represents a danger.
Matthews: Okay, what does Israel get out of that deal? Do they get a year or two or three years of safety?
Brzezinski: Look, if they have a guarantee from the United States they have as much safety as Western Europe, or as Japan, or as South Korea. I think we can do it. But we have to be forthright. And our president and secretary of defense also have to speak forthrightly about this and make it clear we do not want that war, it’s in nobody’s interest.
If Brzezinski’s narrative—that Israel is pulling and dragging America into a war with unpredictable consequences that it does not want—is correct and true then that makes Israel the clear villain in this global drama.
So according to this narrative, America = the subservient dog in the house; and Israel = the rogue wild wolf on the frontier.
But is this the reality, or is it clever CIA/Pentagon propaganda?
The biggest question on the minds of the people of the world is not will a vilified and isolated Israel attack Iran, but, does Israel control Washington, or does Washington control Israel? And by Washington I mean the globalist new world order terrorists in the CIA and the Pentagon who were behind 9/11, and the assassination of JFK.
Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad raised this question back in August 2010 when he challenged President Obama to a live television debate. He said: “Somebody should answer questions whether the US government is dominated by the Zionists or the Zionist regime is controlled by the US government.”
Journalist and author Russ Baker rejects the popular notion that Israel is leading a bewildered Pentagon over the cliff of Armageddon by attacking Iran. In his article, “Is Israel Really Iran’s Main Adversary? The West Doth Protest Too Much,” Baker writes:
“History, and current pressures on the Pentagon to justify its budget in a time of austerity, suggest that the Pentagon is not really opposed to an attack on Iran, only very shrewdly letting someone else get the music started.Make Israel the villain. If there’s one thing that the Left relates to even more than suspicion of the Pentagon: it’s default vilification of Israel as the world’s leading lone wolf miscreant.”
Baker is right.
I’ve come to the conclusion that the Pentagon, CIA, and MI6 are letting Israel and the Zionists take the blame for the coming global war.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
The two staged events that started this world war–the Iranian Islamic Revolution and the 9/11 attacks–were both the products of the shadow CIA and MI6 that exist separately within the official CIA and MI6.
Mossad is only a secondary actor in this game.
I’m not vilifying Israel because it wasn’t Israel that put Khomeini and Islamic radicals in power in Iran in 1979 who cause unnecessary trouble by describing the Israeli government as the “regime occupying Jerusalem.” I’m not vilifying Israel because it wasn’t Israel that staged the hostage crisis in Iran after the Islamic revolution. Both of those manufactured events were engineered by shadow CIA-MI6 operatives and their well-placed friends in Iran’s intelligence and security services. The facts prove it.
But they want us to blame Israel. Why? Because the globalist architects and cultural programmers who want to create a clash of civilizations need a scapegoat. And they tell themselves: who better to blame than the historically persecuted and ancient Jewish people? They expect people to dump their hate and anger on Israel, and absolve the globalist rascals in Washington and London of their sins. Well, I’m not buying it, and neither should you.
World War III isn’t about Israel against the world.
World War II isn’t about Israel provoking an unwanted conflict with Iran and dragging a reluctant Pentagon for the wild ride.
World War III is about the Satanic international banksters and globalist nuclear terrorists in Washington and London sacrificing all three nations involved in the conflict: Israel, Iran, and America.
Let’s not be blinded by anti-Semitism. Let’s not overlook the fact that the globalist genocidal mass murderers who control the CIA, MI6, and Pentagon have plotted a third world war between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Israel since the Soviet Union collapsed, and probably even before then.
Trusting the CIA, MI6, and Pentagon more than the Mossad is a very risky gamble. History shows we would be foolish to take this risk. The narrative the CIA/Pentagon propaganda machine is putting out makes Israel the sole bad guy and abstains them from the guilt and shame of being the murderers behind World War Three and Nuclear Armageddon.
This fractured narrative blurs the truth and shields the globalist terrorists from public wrath. If we are to believe the CIA and Pentagon, Israel and Iran are the demonic villains, and America is the reluctant but stern warrior and international steward of the Persian Gulf and global economy. It is very sweet and touching. Very Hollywoodesque.
This is how the CIA/Pentagon plot reads: Israel and Iran create a huge mess that pulls in America after it decided to leave Iraq and Afghanistan, two newly created democracies. Once again, the blood of Americans must be spilled to resolve the crisis, bring the two parties to the table, and create a lasting peace in the Middle East.
And this is the planned global popular reaction to the telling of this mythical tale: Wow. The U.S. military is so impressive. America is so heroic. Washington is saving civilization. What wonderful people are Pentagon generals and CIA officers. May their hearts be blessed. May they continue to teach the Jews and the Persians how to live together in peace. We hope they never leave the Middle East because their wisdom, maturity, and grace will always be needed in this region of the world.
If only it were true.
If only Pentagon generals and CIA officers weren’t cold-blooded bastards and traitors who would kill an American president in an instant if he crossed their interests.
If only Pentagon generals and CIA officers didn’t write documents like Operation Northwoods that say staging false flag attacks in the United States is okay.
If only the mass murderers and terrorists were in Tel Aviv and nowhere else. But life isn’t that simple.
You can believe in the myth that Israel is the only villain in this drama all you want. In the real world, however, the biggest mass murderers and liars are in London and Washington, not Tel Aviv. They started World War III on September 11, 2001, because they want to destroy America, Israel, Iran, and every nation so they can rule Earth with a global fascist government. ================================= Mossad Boss Secretly Trekked to U.S. Looking for Iran Attack Green Light
The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones’ Facebook Infowars store
Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com February 13, 2012
Mossad boss Tamir Pardo made a secret visit to officials in the United States earlier this month, according to a Newsweek article. An unnamed official involved in the discussion told Newsweek Mossad “wanted to take the pulse of the Obama administration and determine what the consequences would be if Israel bombed Iranian nuclear sites over American objections,” the authors write.
Pardo had a number of questions, including: “What is our posture on Iran? Are we ready to bomb? Would we [do so later]? What does it mean if [Israel] does it anyway?”
Following news of Pardo’s secret meeting, Israel claimed Iran is engaged in attacks on its diplomats. On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran’s proxy Hezbollah was involved in dual bomb attacks on embassies in India and Georgia. There were no deaths in the attacks, although four people were injured, including an Israeli diplomat.
Iran responded by saying Israel had launched a false flag attack on its own embassies in New Delhi and Tbilisi in order to “tarnish Iran’s friendly ties with the host countries.”
“Israel perpetrated the terror actions to launch psychological warfare against Iran,” Iran’s Republic News Agency (IRNA) said.
Israel was accused of bombing its own consulate in London in 1994. Mossad is said to have also bombed the Israeli embassy in Argentina in 1992. The Islamic Jihad Organization claimed responsibility for the attack. Israel said Iran was behind the attack.
In addition to psychological warfare, Israel has conducted a number of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists. A report published by the Sunday Times in January revealed that Mossad was behind the assassination of Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, a nuclear chemist. Following the report, the United States and Britain denied any involvement in the assassination program. Roshan was the fourth scientist killed since January of 2010 and follows a series of attacks on defense and nuclear facilities.
On February 9, it was reported that Mossad used an Iranian terror group to carry out the assassinations. The Israeli intelligence service trained and armed Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization, or MEK, which is officially designated as a terrorist group by the State Department.
The group is supported by the CIA. MEK has killed U.S. servicemen and contractors and supported the takeover of the U.S. embassy in Tehran.
Israel is notorious for “targeted killings,” a euphemism for assassination. In addition to routine killings of Palestinian activists, Mossad targeted Egyptian workers at a rocket factory in Heluan, Egypt, and a German rocket scientist working for Egypt’s missile program. The German scientist, Heinz Krug, was abducted in Munich in 1962 and his body was never found. Similar/Related Articles
‘Ron Paul May Have Already Won by 10 Votes in Maine Caucus’.mp4 Steve Watson Infowars.com February 16, 2012 Yet more evidence of possible vote fraud has been uncovered in Maine, where several towns and counties did caucus but were omitted from the final state count for no identifiable reason.
As we previously reported, much to the ire of the Ron Paul campaign, Washington County – where Ron Paul was incredibly strong – had its caucus delayed by a week due to a warning of snow that never materialized.
In addition, some other towns had scheduled their caucuses differently to the rest of the State and will vote in the days and weeks to come.
Despite these facts, and despite Mitt Romney’s lead being just 194 votes after 84 percent of the voting had taken place, GOP representatives in Maine and the mainstream media declared that Romney was the outright winner, much to the disbelief of many onlookers, especially Ron Paul supporters.
Now it has emerged that Romney’s “victory” in Maine is even more in doubt.
Local reporters in Maine have pounced on the revelations that the vote for most Waldo County towns was entered as “0”, as if no one had turned out to vote.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Rachel Maddow expanded on the reports in a feature on MSNBC yesterday, pointing out that when one town in Waldo attempted to call in its results, State officials said they already had results from the town showing Romney had won, when in reality that wasn’t the case and in fact Ron Paul had won.
In Waterville, Maine, Ron Paul also registered a victory, however, Waterville’s results were also recorded as a “0″ on the final State Tally.
In addition, having said originally that their delayed votes would be added to the State total, Washington County is now being told by State party officials that its result will no longer count at all. This is most likely in anticipation of the fact that Ron Paul supporters could ensure that a huge turnout in the county would hand the Congressman the victory, forcing the Maine Republican Party to backtrack and change the result, as officials were forced to do in Iowa last month.
Watch Maddow’s report:
A local media report adds more context to the potential fraud that has occurred in Maine:
Waldo County Republicans have called for a censure of Maine Republican Party Chairman Charlie Webster for his handling of the caucuses.
The anomalies that have been reported have been dismissed as “clerical errors”, however, the picture is becoming clear. In key places where Ron Paul won in Maine, the votes were simply omitted and ignored by the Republican Party.
The Paul campaign has been vocal about its disappointment with the Maine caucuses. Yet Paul’s campaign staff and Paul himself have pointed out that caucuses are nothing more than a straw poll, and the real contest is in the behind the scenes delegate selection process, where they believe they have cleaned up.
However, it also seems that anomalies have occurred in the delegate selection process in Maine. Local press has reported that in Portland, votes involving the choice of delegates to the state GOP convention, somehow got messed up, prompting officials to declare the vote void.
Many Ron Paul supporters are now calling on the campaign to demand an official recount and an investigation into whether vote fraud has occurred.
We often hear the claim that our nation is a democracy. That wasn’t the vision of the founders. They saw democracy as another form of tyranny. If we’ve become a democracy, I guarantee you that the founders would be deeply … Continue reading →
Senators Frank Church and John Tower examine a CIA poison dart gun that causes cancer and heart attacks.
Peres said the Israeli government should not engage in “unnecessary warmongering” and the issue should fall on the United States and the superpowers.
