New Black Panthers & Birther Controversy: Feds Refuse To Release Obama Draft Card | Tat’s Revolution
Google+ Google+
Home // TO ABOILSH CORPORATE GOVERNMENT // New Black Panthers & Birther Controversy: Feds Refuse To Release Obama Draft Card

New Black Panthers & Birther Controversy: Feds Refuse To Release Obama Draft Card

Government agency not cooperating with eligibility investigation

Steve Watson
March 29, 2012

A request for original documents by a group investigating the eligibility of president Obama has been turned down by The Selective Service System in a move that is sure to court more controversy.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, leader of the probe into the authenticity of the now notorious Obama birth certificate, announced earlier this month that he had cause to believe that Obama’s Selective Service registration form was also a forgery.

Arpaio asked for a response from the federal agency within 30 days on whether or not it will provide a hard copy of the original document.

The Selective Service System has now replied to the request with a three-sentence letter from the office of Selective Service Director Lawrence G. Romo.

“This Agency has no evidence that President Obama’s 1980 registration is not authentic,” wrote Richard S. Flahavan, associate director of public & intergovernmental affairs.

“However, if you have any credible evidence to the contrary and believe that a Federal crime has been committed, we suggest that it be turned over immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to pursue,” the letter concluded.

Unsatisfied with the agency’s response, Arpaio has addressed another correspondence to Romo.

“If your office has the original, authentic Selective Service registration form for Barack Obama from July 29, 1980, please indicate whether or not you are in possession of this document,” Arpaio wrote.

“If the document is in your possession, please make it available for inspection by my Sheriff’s Office investigators. We will travel to your facility to analyze it.”

Arpaio asked for a further response from the agency within ten days.

In his original March 19 letter, Arpaio explained that the document location number and several other identifying factors indicate that Obama’s Selective Service Form was created in 2008 and has been altered to appear as if it dates from 1980.

The Selective Service System response indicates that, much like Hawaii’s Department of Health in regard to the birth certificate, the agency is refusing to comply with requests to allow public inspection of the original document.

Arpaio has also pointed out that Obama’s original Selective Service registration has previously been released at least twice in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, so it makes no sense for the agency to withhold the document from law enforcement officers and court-approved, forensic experts.


Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’, and He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.

Similar/Related Articles


  1. Birther Controversy Back In spotlight As Arpaio Demands Obama Draft Card
  2. Corsi: Trump Conspired With Obama To Neutralize Birther Controversy
  3. Obama: Women Should Register for Draft
  4. Trump Exits After Allowing Obama To Neutralize Birther Controversy
  5. Birther Bombshell: Corsi To Release Evidence Proving Obama Certificate a Fraudulent Composite
  6. Man Obtains Obama’s Purported Social Security Number
  7. Sheriff Arpaio: Obama’s Records Are Missing
  8. Federal Judge Orders Obama to Release Classified Document
  9. Obama Press Sec. Exasperated Over “Birther” Issue
  10. Justice Department Gives Second Ultimatum in Sheriff Arpaio Investigation
  11. Arizona Sheriff Vows to Enforce Immigration Law Whether ‘Feds’ Like It or Not
  12. Feds Declare Tennessee Gun Law Invalid
  13. ###########################################
  14. Pay No Attention to Obama Marching With the New Black Panthers

    Pay No Attention to Obama Marching With the New Black Panthers

    Oct 05, 2011 01:08 PM EST
    Get John Stossel's New Book FREE!

    Andrew Breitbart over at has obtained exclusive photos of President Barack Obama marching as a U.S. Senator in 2007 with the New Black Panther Party before he was elected in 2008.

    Barack Obama appeared and marched with members of the New Black Panther Party as he campaigned for president in Selma, Alabama in March 2007.

    The photographs, captured from a Flickr photo-sharing account before it was scrubbed, are the latest evidence of the mainstream media’s failure to examine Obama’s extremist ties and radical roots.

    Breitbart also writes:

    In addition, the new images raise questions about the possible motives of the Obama administration in its infamous decision to drop the prosecution of the Panthers for voter intimidation.

    The images, presented below, also renew doubts about the transparency of the White House’s guest logs–in particular, whether Panther National Chief Malik Zulu Shabazz is the same “Malik Shabazz” listed among the Obama administration’s early visitors.


    Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams has even more substantial, clear photos of Obama marching with the Black Panthers in his new book Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department.

    Among those appearing with Obama was Shabazz, the Panther leader who was one of the defendants in the voter intimidation case that Attorney General Eric Holder dismissed. Also present was the Panthers’ “Minister of War,” Najee Muhammed, who had called for murdering Dekalb County, Georgia, police officers with AK-47’s and then mocking their widows.



    This is Malik Shabazz:





    President Obama has been exposed, again, for his radical roots, but by all means, let’s continue to accuse the tea party of racism with no evidence. Also, pay no attention to the details of the Black Panther Voter indimidation case, afterall, we just shouldn’t give a darn, right Kirsten?


obama if i had a son he'd look like trayvon birth certificate sad hill news 3

obama if i had a son he’d look like trayvon birth certificate sad hill news 3

Patrick Henningsen
March 29, 2012

PHOENIX – Arizona’s state legislature is currently pushing through a “Candidate Certification Bill” which will directly address the issue of President Obama’s eligibility to hold elected federal office, and ultimately determine his place on the state election ballot come November.

But there exists an effort underway behinds the scenes, which threatens to stall – and eventually kill the legislation.

The bill will require any candidate to sign an affidavit confirming their eligibility documentation, and would impose a penalty for perjury if they were later found to be ineligible.

The bill was presented at a press conference which took place on Tuesday inside the state’s historic capitol court room. Amidst an almost complete national media black-out on the issue, AZ Bill HB2480, spearheaded by State Representative Carl Seel(R), has since passed the Senate Government Reform Committee, but has become stuck in a senate committee.

In addition to members of the state legislature, the bill has received the full backing of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who had assembled a Cold Case Posse some 6 months ago in order to investigate evidence that Barack Obama’s electronic birth certificate. The document was released last year by the White House and posted on their website in PDF form, but Arpaio’s own law enforcement investigation has so far concluded that the President’s document indicates both forgery and fraud. It was these very concerns which prompted Rep. Seel to draft this latest eligibility bill.

According to Seel, “It gives the average citizen the capacity… to challenge any candidate appearing on the Arizona ballot, whether they are properly qualified to be on the said ballot… and the capacity to preserve, defend and protect their Constitution.”

Despite the fact that the bill has the support of both the state’s house and senate, it’s still being held up by Senate President Steve Pierce (R) who has yet to clear the way for a floor debate on the bill.

Pierce claims that he will not clear the way for HB 2480 until Sen. Nancy Barto (R) who chairs the Committee on Healthcare and Medical Liability Reform, where the bill is assigned – and is currently being stalled, allows its passage through.

Dirty tricks behind the scenes?

According to Seel, the reason the bill has been stalled is because of a rather unreasonable request by Sen. Barto. In an unprecedented move, Sen. Barto has solicited from Rep. Seel a “laundry list” – a fully initialed, full list of names of all Arizona Senators who have committed to vote in support the controversial bill.

This request for a ‘laundry list’ flies in the face of the normal honor’s system practice, whereby law makers normally give their bond in the form of a verbal commitment for support of a bill.

Critics of this unorthodox move might rightly suspect that by possessing the names of each legislator beforehand, Sen. Barto – or perhaps another third party, could then get to each of the bills’ supporters before a vote reaches the floor – in order to change the natural outcome of a vote. If the bill was voted down in this way, it would effectively kill off any future attempts to revive such legislation.

Additionally, such an outcome would also take Arizona Governor Jan Brewer(R) out of this controversial spotlight, as she was the person who vetoed a nearly identical bill which was passed in April 2011 by the state legislature.

Brewer claimed in her veto letter that she was worried that the bill empowered Arizona’s secretary of state to judge the qualifications of not only President Obama, but all candidates who would file to run for office.

If the bill does not clear the Rules Committee by Monday is could very well die there.

As WND’s Jerome Corsi has already reported, there are other states who have mounted similar challenges to the President’s claim of eligibility for office, most notably efforts in Georgia.

Corsi explains this week:

“There exists virtually no mechanism in the U.S. for investigating whether or not a presidential candidate meets the Constitution’s Article 2, Section 1, “natural-born citizen” requirement.

Earlier, New Hampshire became the only state to successfully sign into law a bill clarifying eligibility requirements.

But New Hampshire’s H.B. 1245, signed by Democratic Gov. John Lynch, merely requires a statement under penalty of perjury that a candidate meets the qualification requirements of the U.S. Constitution, similar to what the political parties already send to states regarding their candidates.”

Whilst still investigating the validity of President Obama’s birth certificate, as well as the President’s Selective Service Registration card which is also believed to be forged, Sheriff Arpaio still expects to unearth yet more additional new evidence over the coming weeks.

Arpaio adds, “This investigation is not going away. It is an ongoing investigation.”


Watch the March 27, 2011 press conference below:

  1. Demand Investigation into Obama Eligibility Requirements for President and Second Term Run
  2. Sheriff Arpaio: Obama’s Records Are Missing
  3. Obama’s Eligibility: Here’s Your Sign!
  4. Arizona Senate passes ‘birther’ bill
  5. Phil Berg Announces Obama Care Eligibility March on Washington May 29th, 2010
  6. Obama Fanatic Found Guilty of Threats to Kill Sheriff Joe and Family
  7. Court won’t review Obama’s eligibility
  8. MCSO: Obama Eligibility Cold Case Investigation (Full Press Conference)
  9. ‘Fast and Furious’ weapons found at more violent crime scenes
  10. Obama and the Patriot Act: “Yes We Can” Kill the Bill of Rights
  11. New Bill Gives Obama ‘Kill Switch’ To Shut Down The Internet
  12. Senate Bill Would Give President Obama Authority to Pull the Plug on Your Internet

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: